Lawson v. State, 610 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Lawson v. State, 610 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sedrick LAWSON
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 91-1864.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec 23, 1992.
Published opinion
610 So. 2d 714
1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13544
1992 WL 379852
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Eric M. Cumfer, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Alderman, Dell, Gunther, James.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for the sale or delivery of cocaine. However, we agree with appellant that the trial court erred by failing to make specific findings required under the habitual offender statute. Van Bryant v. State, 602 So.2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s sentence as a habitual offender and remand this matter to the trial court for resentencing. On remand, the trial court may. again sentence appellant as a habitual offender upon making the requisite findings as required by section 775.084(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1991).

DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., and ALDERMAN, JAMES E., Senior Justice, concur.