Leflora v. Royal Am. Mgmt., Inc., 260 So. 3d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). · Go Syfert
Search
Leflora v. Royal Am. Mgmt., Inc., 260 So. 3d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Yachtbrasil Motor Boat & Charters, LLC v. CNP Xii Ventures LLC, 347 So. 3d 501 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 518 It is well- established that ‘[p]iecemeal appeals will not be permitted where claims are interrelated and involve the same transaction and the same parties remain in the suit.’2 citing cases1 citing court put it this way
  • Yachtbrasil Motor Boat & Charters, LLC v. CNP Xii Ventures LLC, 347 So. 3d 501 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022).published
    (It is well- established that ‘[p]iecemeal appeals will not be permitted where claims are interrelated and involve the same transaction and the same parties remain in the suit.’)
  • Homeowners Choice Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Patrick Fraser, 346 So. 3d 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022).published
    Ctr., Inc., 260 So. 3d 515, 518 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“It is well-established that ‘[p]iecemeal appeals will not be permitted where claims are interrelated and involve the 1 Arguably, the decree doesn’t resolve the entirety of the declarator…
At page 517 concluding that an order granting summary judgment on the only claim was not a partial final judgment because related counterclaims remained pending1 citing case1 citing court put it this way
  • Medvend, LLC v. Innovations Avocare, LLC, 397 So. 3d 272 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).published
    (concluding that an order granting summary judgment on the only claim was not a partial final judgment because related counterclaims remained pending)
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clarence LEFLORA, Jr., an Individual
v.
ROYAL AMERICAN MANAGEMENT, INC., a Florida Profit Corporation
No. 3D17-1767.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec 12, 2018.
Published opinion
260 So. 3d 515
Goldberg & Rosen, P.A., and Judd G. Rosen, Zachary D. Bodenheimer, and Khristopher R. Salado, for appellant., Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Kathryn L. Ender, and Maria D. Vera, for appellee.
Lagoa, Lindsey, Scales.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Carbonell v. BellSouth Telcomms., Inc., 675 So.2d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) ("A party seeking a continuance bears the burden of showing, by affidavit, the existence and availability of other evidence, its relevance, the efforts taken to produce it, and that any failure to do so is not the result of the movant's inexcusable delay." (citing Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(f) ) ).