Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
19 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Leflora v. Royal Am. Mgmt., Inc.green1 sentence2024Ctr., Inc., 260 So. 3d 515, 517-18 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (concluding that an order granting summary judgment on the only claim was not a partial final judgment because related counterclaims remained pending). | 1 | 1 |
Jensen v. Whetstinegreen1 sentence2024See, e.g., Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So. 2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (dismissing appeal where the dismissed claim involved the same parties and underlying facts as claims that remained pending); Libman v. Fla. Wellness & Rehab. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Balezosgreen1 sentence2017“A trial court’s decision to grant a motion to dismiss will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.” State v. Balezos, 765 So.2d 819, 822 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). | 1 | 1 |
Joseph v. Chaningreen1 sentence2010“Conversion is defined as ‘an act of dominion wrongfully asserted over, and inconsistent with, another’s possessory rights in personal property.’ ” Joseph v. Chanin, 940 So.2d 483, 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (quoting Goodwin v. Alexatos, 584 So.2d 1007, 1011 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)). | 1 | 1 |
Goodwin v. Alexatosgreen1 sentence2010“Conversion is defined as ‘an act of dominion wrongfully asserted over, and inconsistent with, another’s possessory rights in personal property.’ ” Joseph v. Chanin, 940 So.2d 483, 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (quoting Goodwin v. Alexatos, 584 So.2d 1007, 1011 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)). | 1 | 1 |
Vonmitschke-Collande v. Kramergreen1 sentence2008P. 1.420(f) ("If a notice of lis pendens has been filed in connection with a claim for affirmative relief that is dismissed under this rule, the notice of lis pendens connected with the dismissed claim is automatically dissolved at the same time."); Vonmitschke-Collande v. Kramer, 841 So.2d 481, 482 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) ("The Florida Supreme Court made it abundantly clear that when an underlying case's dismissal is reversed, the accompanying lis pendens is reinstated."), review denied sub nom. | 1 | 1 |
Kates v. Robinsongreen1 sentence2007In an appeal from that decision we affirmed the dismissal, saying that "[u]nder no interpretation of these facts can Jay be liable for [malpractice]. . . ." Kates v. Robinson, 786 So.2d 61, 65 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). | 1 | 1 |
Register v. Stategreen1 sentence2004In Register v. State, 619 So.2d 498, 499 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), we stated that an issue concerning the scoring of prior convictions that "may be voidable for constitutional infirmities" cannot be raised for the first time on appeal or in a motion to correct illegal sentence; however, the issue could constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. | 1 | 1 |
Miller v. State Entomologistgreen1 sentence2003It is not necessary to *1051 wait for absolute infection before the cedars may be destroyed." Id. at 818. | 1 | 1 |
Schimmel v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.green1 sentence1988The trial court dismissed the claim "upon a ruling that the doctrine against impermissibly splitting causes of action bar[red] this action as a matter of law," a policy which "avoids vexatious and multiple lawsuits arising out of a single incident." 506 So.2d at 1164 ( emphasis supplied ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Curd v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC
red
1 sentence2018Id. at 1219 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Spera v. State
green
1 sentence2011The court dismissed claims l(a, b, d, e) as facially insufficient and provided leave for Gosney to “timely” file a facially sufficient claim pursuant to Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Page v. Matthews
green
2 sentences2003In so ruling, the court cited Page v. Matthews, 386 So.2d 815 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), wherein the fifth district stated that "an action for conversion is regarded as a possessory action and the plaintiff must have a present or immediate right of possession of the property in question." Id. at 816 . 2003In so ruling, the court cited Page v. Matthews, 386 So.2d 815 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), wherein the fifth district stated that "an action for conversion is regarded as a possessory action and the plaintiff must have a present or immediate right of possession of the property in question." Id. at 816 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Anchor Bank, S.S.B. v. Conrardy
green
1 sentence2003In, Anchor Bank, S.S.B. v. Conrardy, 763 So.2d 360 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), this court held that it is: well-settled law in Florida that a condition precedent to rescission is that the other party be returned to his status quo. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co.
green
1 sentence2002The majority begins its choice of law "journey" with Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co., 389 So.2d 999 (Fla.1980), and thereby handily escapes the inconvenience of a significant part of the history of choice of law rules in Florida. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Moransais v. Heathman
red
1 sentence2000Significantly, the trial court denied Ms. Morgan's request to amend her pleadings to state a cause of action after the supreme court issued its decision in Moransais v. Heathman, 744 So.2d 973 (Fla.1999). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Hullinger v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
green
1 sentence1999Id. at 232 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Ingersoll v. Hoffman
green
1 sentence1994Ingersoll v. Hoffman, 561 So.2d 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Hoppe v. Hearst Corp.
green
1 sentence1990The court dismissed his claim concluding that, considering the context of the statements and their tone, the column did not allege defamatory facts as a matter of law. 770 P.2d at 207 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Quest v. Joseph
green
1 sentence1981While the appeal was pending this court issued an opinion in Quest v. Joseph, 392 So.2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) holding that an action for contribution may be maintained against the parent of an injured minor child-plaintiff notwithstanding the child’s inability to sue the parent directly even when the parent’s liability involves negligent supervision of the child. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Martin Company v. Carpenter
green
2 sentences1973However, this Court failed to apply the rule to the facts of Martin Company v. Carpenter, supra , because of a lack of evidence on the employer's reliance on the misrepresentations, and because it approved of the disallowance of the claim on the grounds of there being no accidental injury. 1973This Court dismissed the claim and, after extensive discussion of public policy and decisions from other jurisdictions, set forth the following rule: "[A] false representation as to physical condition or health made by an employee in procuring employment will preclude the benefits of the Workmen's Compensation *20 Act for an otherwise compensable injury if there is shown to be a causal relationship between the injury and the false representation and if it is also shown that (1) the employee knew the representation to be false, (2) the employer relied upon the false representation and (3) such | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.