Pearson v. Miami-Dade Cnty., 741 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Pearson v. Miami-Dade Cnty., 741 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leroy PEARSON
v.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY
No. 98-2006.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sep 29, 1999.
Published opinion
741 So. 2d 635
1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12742
1999 WL 765932
Leroy Pearson, in proper person., Robert A. Ginsburg, County Attorney, and David Stephen Hope, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.
Fletcher, Schwartz, Shevin.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Wé treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari to review an opinion of the Circuit Court Appellate Division. We deny certiorari as the opinion does not depart from the essential requirements of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice. Haines City Comm. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523 (Fla.1995). A courtesy warning is not required where there has been a repeat violation or. “the violation presents a serious threat to the public health, safety, or welfare ...” § 162.21(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997).

Certiorari denied.