State v. Jefferson, 791 A.2d 566 (Conn. 2002).

State v. Jefferson, 791 A.2d 566 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment published Issue: misconduct was invited defenseCT ↗ Issue: adverse inference instructionCT ↗ Issue: permit violationCT ↗ Issue: alibi defenseCT ↗ 6.8 score

73 citation events (73 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: State v. Estrada, 802 A.2d 873 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002)

Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

2002 2014 2026

How cited ↗

Cited for

Other citing cases10 with no pin cite or quoted language on record

State v. Estrada, 802 A.2d 873 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002).published
State v. Porfil, No. AC40305 (Conn. App. Ct. July 30, 2019).published 2 cites
State v. Davis, 854 A.2d 67 (Conn. App. Ct. 2004).published 2 cites
State v. Commins, 850 A.2d 1074 (Conn. App. Ct. 2004).published 2 cites
State v. Izzo, 843 A.2d 661 (Conn. App. Ct. 2004).published 2 cites
State v. Jeffreys, 828 A.2d 659 (Conn. App. Ct. 2003).published 2 cites
State v. Padua, 808 A.2d 361 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002).published 2 cites
State v. Wickes, 805 A.2d 142 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002).published 2 cites
State v. Pereira, 806 A.2d 51 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002).published 2 cites
Pierce v. Fales, No. Cv-99-0088423 S (May 3, 2002), 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 5740 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2002).unpublished

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 54

Cited "see" 17

Compared "cf." 1

Cited as authority (rule) 1

Treatment by court

connappct		0R/0Y/17G	72
connsuperct		0R/0Y/1G	1

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ANTHONY JEFFERSON

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Jan 28, 2002.

Published opinion

791 A.2d 566

2002 Conn. LEXIS 65

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Pamela S. Nagy, special public defender, in support of the petition., Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 67 Conn. App. 249 (AC 20112), is denied.

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Your account