United States v. Eugenio Haros-Giron, 487 F. App'x 405 (9th Cir. 2012). · Go Syfert
United States v. Eugenio Haros-Giron, 487 F. App'x 405 (9th Cir. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Eugenio HAROS-GIRON, Defendant-Appellant
11-50563.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Nov 19, 2012.
Unpublished opinion
487 F. App'x 405
Arnold Dale Blankenship, Bruce R. Cas-tetter, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Gordon Stewart Brownell, St. Helena, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Canby, Trott, Fletcher.
Unpublished

MEMORANDUM **

Eugenio Haros-Giron appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to import marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960, 963; and importation of marijuana and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960, and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

[*406] Haros-Giron contends that the district court erred by denying him relief under the safety valve provision of the Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. This contention fails. The record supports the district court’s determination that Haros-Giron acted as a manager or supervisor during the commission of the offense. See U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(b); United States v. Egge, 223 F.3d 1128, 1132 (9th Cir.2000). Because Haros-Giron’s aggravating role in the offense precludes the application of safety valve relief, the district court did not err. See U.S.S.G. § 5C 1.2(a)(4).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.