At page 515 Consolidating sentences under state law and u.s.s.g. guidelines1 citing caseexplaining that one of the defendant’s North Carolina offenses was not assigned any points because it was “counted together” aá a result of the consolidated sentence law
- United States v. Rafael Marroquin, 874 F.3d 851 (5th Cir. 2017).published(explaining that one of the defendant’s North Carolina offenses was not assigned any points because it was “counted together” aá a result of the consolidated sentence law)
v.
Miguel RODRIGUEZ-PRIETO, Defendant-Appellant
Miguel Rodriguez-Prieto (Rodriguez) appeals his 87-month sentence for illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He asserts that the district court plainly erred by assigning a criminal history point under U.S.S.G. § 4Al.l(f) (2009) under the theo[*515] ry that the sentence for one of his North Carolina crimes of violence did not receive any points because it was counted together with the sentence imposed for the other North Carolina offense under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2). He asserts that the two offenses were consolidated in a single judgment that produced a single sentence under North Carolina General Statutes § 15A-1340.15(b).
The North Carolina procedure does not affect the Guideline § 4A1.2(a)(2) direction that “any prior sentence covered by (A) or (B)” is counted as a single sentence. It follows that, whether the district judge added one history point because of § 4Al.l(f) or three more for the second crime of violence, there was no error for defendant’s complaint.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.