Nixon v. Farm Bureau Gen. Ins. Co. of Michigan, 781 N.W.2d 105 (Mich. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Nixon v. Farm Bureau Gen. Ins. Co. of Michigan, 781 N.W.2d 105 (Mich. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
414 citation events (414 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re G L Edwards Minor, No. 366312 (Mich. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2023)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
It is not for this Court to displace the trial court’s credibility determination.no pin page on record · 2 citing cases listed
  • In Re G L Edwards Minor, No. 366312 (Mich. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2023).unpublished
    (It is not for this Court to displace the trial court’s credibility determination.)
  • In Re M R Sivanov Minor, No. 357796 (Mich. Ct. App. Feb. 17, 2022).unpublished
    (It is not for this Court to displace the trial court’s credibility determination.)
At page 113 use of unrecorded in camera interviews violates parents’ due process rights1 citing case1 citing court put it this way
  • People v. T.K. & J.M, 2017 COA 70, 417 P.3d 875.published 2 cites
    (use of unrecorded in camera interviews violates parents’ due process rights)
At page 115 analyzing a claim that child custody proceedings violated the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee to the right of counsel1 citing case1 citing court put it this way
  • Clark v. 7th Circuit Court, No. 3:21-cv-10690 (E.D. Mich. May 3, 2021).
    (analyzing a claim that child custody proceedings violated the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee to the right of counsel)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“it is not for this court to displace the trial court's credibility determination.”quoted beside the cite; not in this opinion · 2 citing cases listed
  • In Re G L Edwards Minor, No. 366312 (Mich. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2023).unpublished
    “it is not for this court to displace the trial court's credibility determination.”
  • In Re M R Sivanov Minor, No. 357796 (Mich. Ct. App. Feb. 17, 2022).unpublished
    “it is not for this court to displace the trial court's credibility determination.”
“having concluded that at least one ground for termination existed, we need not consider the additional grounds upon which the trial court based its decision.”quoted beside the cite; not in this opinion · 2 citing cases listed
  • in Re J E Leslie Minor, No. 326098 (Mich. Ct. App. Oct. 13, 2015).unpublished
    “having concluded that at least one ground for termination existed, we need not consider the additional grounds upon which the trial court based its decision.”
  • In Re R Robinson Minor, No. 368420 (Mich. Ct. App. May 23, 2024).unpublished
    “Having concluded that at least one ground for termination existed, we need not consider the additional grounds upon which the trial court based its decision.”
Other citing cases4 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shirley T. NIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee.
139983.
Michigan Supreme Court.
May 6, 2010.
Published opinion
781 N.W.2d 105
2010 Mich. LEXIS 871
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
4 passages pin-cited by 7 cases
Pinpoint authority: #8,941 of 633,719
Citer courts: Michigan Court of Appeals (7)

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 1, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.