In Re Mitchell, 773 N.W.2d 663 (Mich. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Mitchell, 773 N.W.2d 663 (Mich. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (36 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: in Re J Ferranti Minor (mich, 2019-06-12)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) in Re J Ferranti Minor (4×) also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
Mich. · 2019 · confidence medium
See Hudson, 483 Mich at 928 (“The trial court also committed plain error, People v Carines, 460 Mich 750, 763 (1999), in failing to . . . timely appoint counsel in violation of MCL 712A.17c(4) and (5), MCR 3.915(B)(1), MCR 3.965(B)(5), and MCR 3.974(B)(3)(a)(i), and in failing to advise the respondent that her plea could later be used in a proceeding to terminate parental rights in violation of MCR 3.917(B)(4).”); Mitchell, 485 Mich at 922 (“[T]he trial court committed plain error, People v Carines, 460 Mich 750, 763 (1999), in failing to timely appoint counsel in violation of MCL 712A.1…
discussed Cited "see" in Re demontigny/laube Minors (2×)
Mich. Ct. App. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Mitchell, 485 Mich 922 ; 773 NW2d 663 (2009); In re Hudson, 483 Mich 920 , 928-929; 763 NW2d 618 (2009).4 Nevertheless, we do not believe that this error resulted in an improper termination or affected the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings independent of the outcome.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Alexander MITCHELL, Nathan Mitchell, and Nicholas Mitchell, Minors. Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
William Mitchell, Respondent-Appellant.
139114.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Oct 23, 2009.
773 N.W.2d 663
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published

Order

By order of July 28, 2009, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion and because the trial court committed plain error, People v. Carines, 460 Mich. 750, 763, 597 N.W.2d 130 (1999), in failing to timely appoint counsel in violation of MCL 712A.17c(4) and (5), MCR 3.915(B)(1), MCR 3.965(B)(5), and MCR 3.974(B)(3)(a)(i), and in failing to advise the respondent that his plea could later be used in a proceeding to terminate his parental rights in violation of MCR 3.917(B)(4). Accordingly, we REMAND this case to the Clinton Circuit Court Family Division for further proceedings not[*664] inconsistent with this order. The motion to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED.

We do not retain jurisdiction.