People v. Mungo, 792 N.W.2d 686 (Mich. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Mungo, 792 N.W.2d 686 (Mich. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 4 distinct cases, 2020–2022 · …thus, the standing inquiry focuses on whether a litigant is a proper party to request adjudication of a particular issue and not whether the issue itself is justiciable. ⚠ not in text Topic ↗
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, 2020–2022 · …a litigant may have standing . . . if the litigant has a special injury or right, or substantial interest, that will be detrimentally affected in a manner different from the citizenry at large or if the statutory scheme implies that the legislature intended to confer standing on… ⚠ not in text Topic ↗
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases · …if the litigant has a special injury or right, or substantial interest, that will be detrimentally affected in a manner different from the citizenry at large or if the statutory scheme implies that the legislature intended to confer standing on the litigant. ⚠ not in text Topic ↗
331 citation events (331 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: 20231214_C368615_67_368615.Opn.Pdf (michctapp, 2023-12-14)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) 20231214_C368615_67_368615.Opn.Pdf
Mich. Ct. App. · 2023 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
whenever a litigant meets the requirements of mcr 2.605, it is sufficient to establish standing to seek a declaratory judgment
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Cary Investments LLC v. City of Mount Pleasant
Mich. Ct. App. · 2022 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the standing inquiry focuses on whether a litigant 'is a proper party to request adjudication of a particular issue and not whether the issue itself is justiciable
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Department of Civil Rights v. Suburban Mobility Authority
Mich. Ct. App. · 2016 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the standing inquiry focuses on whether a litigant is a proper party to request adjudication of a particular issue and not whether the issue itself is justiciable.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Stephen Serkaian, et al. v. White Lake Fire Authority, et al.
W.D. Mich. · 2026 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 792 N.W.2d 686, 746 (Mich. 2010).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Jonathan Lindsey v. Gretchen Whitmer
6th Cir. · 2024 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 792 N.W.2d 686, 692 (Mich. 2010) (quotation omitted).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Franz v. Oxford Community School District
E.D. Mich. · 2023 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 792 N.W.2d 686, 702 (Mich. 2010) (finding that teachers had standing to seek injunctive relief under state law to expel students who had allegedly assaulted them)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, d/b/a Fannie Mae v. River Houze, LLC
E.D. Mich. · 2022 · confidence medium
Ass'n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 487 Mich. 349 , 792 N.W.2d 686, 699 (2010).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Laws v. Grayeyes
Utah · 2021 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 792 N.W.2d 686, 693 (Mich. 2010).64 ¶104 Lansing is instructive.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Reclaim Idaho/Gilmore v. Denney
Idaho · 2021 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 792 N.W.2d 686, 696 (Mich. 2010); Stockmeier v. Nevada Dep’t of Corrs.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Reclaim Idaho/Gilmore v. Denney
Idaho · 2021 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 792 N.W.2d 686, 696 (Mich. 2010); Stockmeier v. Nevada Dep’t of Corrs.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Reclaim Idaho/Gilmore v. Denney
Idaho · 2021 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 792 N.W.2d 686, 696 (Mich. 2010); Stockmeier v. Nevada Dep’t of Corrs.
cited Cited as authority (rule) H & N Realty, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Company of America
E.D. Mich. · 2021 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 487 Mich. 349, 372 ; 792 N.W.2d 686, 699 (2010).2 An insurance policy is a contractual agreement between the insured and the insurer.
examined Cited as authority (rule) Robert Davis v. Detroit Public Sch. Cmty. Dist. (3×) also: Cited "see"
6th Cir. · 2020 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 792 N.W.2d 686, 699 (Mich. 2010).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Estate of Jacob Chubb v. Daimler Trucks North America LLC
E.D. Mich. · 2019 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 792 N.W.2d, 686, 699 (Mich. 2010)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Hurst v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (2×)
6th Cir. · 2016 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 487 Mich. 349 , 792 N.W.2d 686, 699 (2010)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Jackson v. Bank of America, N.A.
E.D. Mich. · 2014 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 487 Mich. 349 , 792 N.W.2d 686, 699 (2010).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Melissa Downey v. Fed. Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n
6th Cir. · 2014 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 487 Mich. 349 , 792 N.W.2d 686, 699 (2010).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Abraham Elsheick v. Select Portfolio Servicing
6th Cir. · 2014 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 487 Mich. 349 , 792 N.W.2d 686, 699 (2010).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Hills Howard v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
6th Cir. · 2014 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 487 Mich. 349 , 792 N.W.2d 686, 699 (2010).
examined Cited as authority (rule) Gregory v. Shurtleff (3×)
Utah · 2013 · confidence medium
Ass'n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 487 Mich. 349 , 792 N.W.2d 686, 689 (2010); see generally Kenneth Charette, Standing Alone?: The Michigan Supreme Court, the Lansing Decision, and the Liberalization of the Standing Doctrine, 116 PEnn St.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Gregory v. Shurtleff
Utah · 2013 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 792 N.W.2d 686, 689 (Mich. 2010); see generally Kenneth Charette, Stand- ing Alone?: The Michigan Supreme Court, the Lansing Decision, and the Liberalization of the Standing Doctrine, 116 PENN ST.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Gregory v. Shurtleff
Utah · 2013 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 792 N.W.2d 686, 689 (Mich. 2010); see generally Kenneth Charette, Stand- ing Alone?: The Michigan Supreme Court, the Lansing Decision, and the Liberalization of the Standing Doctrine, 116 PENN ST.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Abdullah El-Seblani v. IndyMac Mortgage Services
6th Cir. · 2013 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 487 Mich. 349 , 792 N.W.2d 686, 699 (2010).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Frank Ellias v. Phoenix Life Insurance Company
6th Cir. · 2012 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 487 Mich. 349 , 792 N.W.2d 686, 699 (2010).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Poe v. Snyder
W.D. Mich. · 2011 · confidence medium
Ass’n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 487 Mich. 349, 362 , 792 N.W.2d 686, 694 (2010) (stating that "strictly interpreting the judicial power of Michigan courts to be identical to the federal court's judicial power does not reflect the broader power held by state courts").
cited Cited "see" Committee for Marshall-Not the Megasite v. City of Marshall
Mich. Ct. App. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" Gary Dickey Jr. v. Iowa Ethics and Campaign Disclosure Board (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Iowa · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lansing, 792 N.W.2d at 699 .
discussed Cited "see" Jode Investments LLC v. Burning Tree Properties LLC
Mich. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. (stating that the focus is on whether a litigant is the proper party to request adjudication of a particular issue).
discussed Cited "see" Jode Investments LLC v. Burning Tree Properties LLC
Mich. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. (stating that the focus is on whether a litigant is the proper party to request adjudication of a particular issue).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." House of Representatives v. Governor
Mich. Ct. App. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
No person exercising powers of one branch shall exercise powers properly belonging to another branch except as expressly provided in this constitution.” Const 1963, art 3, § 2,” (Separation of Powers of Government.); see also Nat’l Wildlife Federation v Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co, 471 Mich 608, 613 , 684 NW2d 800 (2004) (“By separating the powers of government, the framers of the Michigan Constitution sought to disperse governmental power and thereby to limit its exercise.”), overruled on other grounds by Lansing Sch Ed Ass’n v Lansing Bd of Ed 487 Mich 349 , 792 NW2d 686 (2010).1 U…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
People of Michigan
v.
Michael William Mungo
136017.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Jun 23, 2009.
792 N.W.2d 686
2009 Mich. LEXIS 1343
Cited by 246 opinions  |  Published
3 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: #28,611 of 633,719
Citer courts: Michigan Court of Appeals (3)

Summary Disposition June 23, 2009:

By order of May 27, 2008, the application for leave to appeal the January 17, 2008, judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Arizona v Gant (Docket No. 07-542). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on April 21, 2009, Arizona v Gant, 556 US _; 129 S Ct 1710; 173 L Ed 2d 485 (2009), the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand this case to that court for reconsideration in light of the decision in Arizona v Gant.

We further note that a similar issue is presented in People v Hunter, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued April[*1092] 3, 2008 (Docket No. 272873), which we have peremptorily vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Gant by order dated June 23, 2009 (Docket No. 136546). We do not retain jurisdiction. Court of Appeals No. 269250.