Ins. Inst. of Michigan v. Comm'r Fin. & Ins. Servs., 764 N.W.2d 571 (Mich. 2009). · Go Syfert
Ins. Inst. of Michigan v. Comm'r Fin. & Ins. Servs., 764 N.W.2d 571 (Mich. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Department of Agriculture v. Appletree Marketing, LLC (mich, 2010-03-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Department of Agriculture v. Appletree Marketing, LLC
Mich. · 2010 · confidence medium
See MCL 290.655(f). 8 Dep’t of Agriculture v Appletree Marketing, LLC, 280 Mich App 635, 645 ; 761 NW2d 277 (2008). 9 Dep’t of Agriculture v Appletree Marketing, LLC, 483 Mich 1000, 1000-1001 (2009). 10 See Detroit v Ambassador Bridge Co, 481 Mich 29, 35 ; 748 NW2d 221 (2008). 11 See Kaiser v Allen, 480 Mich 31, 35 ; 746 NW2d 92 (2008). 12 Dep’t of Agriculture, 280 Mich App at 642 , quoting Monroe Beverage Co, Inc v Stroh Brewery Co, 454 Mich 41, 45 ; 559 NW2d 297 (1997). 13 Morales v Auto-Owners Ins Co (After Remand), 469 Mich 487, 490 ; 672 NW2d 849 (2003) (quotation marks and citation…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Insurance Institute of Michigan
v.
Commissioner Financial & Insurance Services, Department of Labor & Economic Growth
137400 and 137407.
Michigan Supreme Court.
May 7, 2009.
764 N.W.2d 571
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether, under § 64 of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), MCL 24.264, the plaintiffs were permitted to bring an original declaratory judgment action in the circuit court without having first requested a declaratory ruling from the defendant; (2) whether § 244(1) of the Insurance Code, MCL 500.244(1), provides the exclusive means of seeking judicial review of rules promulgated by the defendant; (3) whether judicial review of the challenged administrative rules was limited to the administrative record prepared during the public hearing process, see § 104(3) of the APA, MCL 24.304(3), and Michigan Ass’n of Home Builders v Dep’t of Labor & Economic Growth, 481 Mich 496 (2008); and (4) whether the challenged administrative rules (a) violated the plaintiffs’ due process rights, (b) were valid and enforceable under the Insurance Code, (c) were arbitrary and capricious, or (d) exceeded defendant’s rulemaking authority.

The motion for expedited consideration is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to place this case on the October 2009 session calendar for argument and submission. The Insurance and Indemnity Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, the American Insurance Association, the Michigan Consumer Federation, and the National Consumer Law Center are invited to file briefs amicus curiae.

Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.