Lambert v. California, 355 U.S. 937 (1958).

Lambert v. California, 355 U.S. 937 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment published Issue: mens rea requirementMD ↗ 2.7 score

35 citation events across 19 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: Artway v. Attorney Gen. of New Jersey, 876 F. Supp. 666 (D.N.J. 1995)

Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

1958 1992 2026

How cited ↗

Cited for

Other citing cases4 with no pin cite or quoted language on record

Artway v. Attorney Gen. of New Jersey, 876 F. Supp. 666 (D.N.J. 1995).published 2 cites
Hutchison Bros. Excavation Co. v. Dist. of Columbia, 278 A.2d 318 (D.C. 1971).published 2 cites
State v. Gruen, 586 So. 2d 1280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).published
United States v. Frezzo Bros., 546 F. Supp. 713 (E.D. Pa. 1982).published 2 cites

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 26

Cited "see" 4

Cited "see, e.g." 3

Compared "cf." 2

Treatment by court

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

Lambert
v.
California

No. 47.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Jan 27, 1958.

Published opinion

355 U.S. 937

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Cited by 2 opinions | Published

ante, p. 225. Petition for rehearing and/or modification of the opinion denied.

Your account