green
Positive treatment
published
Issue: predecessor ruleNJ ↗
Issue: res judicata doctrineNJ ↗
Issue: overarching principleNJ ↗
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Cited for
Other citing cases
- New Jersey Election Law Enf't Comm'n Vs. Joseph Divincenzo & Jorge Martinez(election Law Enf't Comm'n), 169 A.3d 1002 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2017).published
- Velasquez v. Franz, 589 A.2d 143 (N.J. 1991).published
- NJ Optometric Ass'n v. Hillman-Kohan Eyeglasses, Inc., 388 A.2d 1299 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1978).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey
v.
Neeld, Director, Division of Taxation, Department of Treasury
v.
Neeld, Director, Division of Taxation, Department of Treasury
No. 1010.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 1958.
Published opinion
Augustus Nasmith for the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co., Joseph C. Olavin for the Pennsylvania Railroad Co. et al., and Raymond J. Lamb for the Erie Railroad Co. et al., petitioners. David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Theodore L. Botter and William L. Boyan, Deputy Attorneys General, for Neeld, Leo Rosenblum for the City of Jersey City et al., James Rosen for the Township of Weehawken, Herbert H. Fine for the City of Hoboken, Vincent J. Casale for the City of Newark, and Norman Heine for the City of Camden, respondents.
Cited by 12 opinions | Published
Supreme Court of New Jersey. Certiorari denied.