green
Positive treatment
published
Issue: Sullivan testAL ↗
Issue: rule rather exceptionAZ ↗
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Cited for
In the First Amendment area, summary procedures are even more essential. For the stake, here, if harassment succeeds, is free debate.
- Read v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., 805 P.2d 1062 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990).published (In the First Amendment area, summary procedures are even more essential. For the stake, here, if harassment succeeds, is free debate.)
- United States v. Gen. Motors Corp., 518 F.2d 420 (D.C. Cir. 1975).published(In the First Amendment area, summary procedures are even more essential.)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“in the first amendment area, summary procedures are even more essential. for the stake, here, if harassment succeeds, is free debate.”
- Read v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., 805 P.2d 1062 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990).published “in the first amendment area, summary procedures are even more essential. for the stake, here, if harassment succeeds, is free debate.”
- United States v. Gen. Motors Corp., 518 F.2d 420 (D.C. Cir. 1975).published“in the first amendment area, summary procedures are even more essential.”
Other citing cases
- North Dakota State Univ. v. United States, 255 F.3d 599 (8th Cir. 2001).published
- Foley v. WCCO Television, Inc., 449 N.W.2d 497 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989).published
- Herbert v. Lando, 781 F.2d 298 (2d Cir. 1986).published
- Nash v. Jacqueline Cochran, Inc., 548 F. Supp. 676 (S.D.N.Y. 1982).published
- Kotlikoff v. Cmty. News, 444 A.2d 1086 (N.J. 1982).published
- McManus v. Doubleday & Co., 513 F. Supp. 1383 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).published
- Loeb v. New Times Commc'ns Corp., 497 F. Supp. 85 (S.D.N.Y. 1980).published
- Nader v. De Toledano, 408 A.2d 31 (D.C. 1979).published
- Long v. Egnor, 346 S.E.2d 778 (W. Va. 1986).published
- Spellman v. Am. Sec. Bank, N.A., 504 A.2d 1119 (D.C. 1986).published
Show 4 more citing cases
- Elizabeth Peterson v. United States, 694 F.2d 943 (3d Cir. 1982).published
- MacHleder v. Diaz, 538 F. Supp. 1364 (S.D.N.Y. 1982).published
- Steaks Unlimited, Inc. v. Deaner, 468 F. Supp. 779 (W.D. Pa. 1979).published
- Bouchard v. Washington, 514 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1975).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Keogh
v.
Washington Post Co.
v.
Washington Post Co.
No. 725.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1967.
Published opinion
Philip Handelman for petitioner., James H. McGlothlin for respondent.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Arizona (1)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.