Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Cited for
. . . (R)ules ordinarily look to the future and are applied prospectively only . . . .
- Citizens to Save Spencer Cnty. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Alabama Power Co., Am. Petroleum Inst., Sierra Club, Bf Goodrich Co., Am. Paper Inst., Hoosier Energy Div., Mountain Fuel Supply Co., Montana Power Co., Nat. Resources Council of Maine, Pittston Co., Intervenors. Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, U. S. Env't Prot. Agency N. Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Montana Power Co., Intervenors. Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, U. S. Env't Prot. Agency, Nat. Resources Council of Maine, Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, U. S. Env't Prot. Agency, the Bf Goodrich Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Hampton Roads Energy Co. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Env't Prot. Agency, N. Cheyenne Tribe, Sierra Club, & Friends of the Earth v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, the Montana Power Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, N. Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Pittston Co., Colorado Interstate Gas Co., Ideal Basic Indus., Inc., Intervenors. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, the Pittston Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Am. Paper Inst. & the Nat'l Forest Prods. Ass'n v. United States Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Mfg. Chemists Ass'n, Chem. Prods. Corp., Dow Chem. Co., Fmc Corp., Monsanto Co., Ppg Indus., Inc., Rohm & Haas Co., Stauffer Chem. Co., Union Carbide Corp., Allied Chem. Corp. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Alabama By-Prods. Corp. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Koppers Co., Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r of Epa, Usm Corp. v. Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Epa, 600 F.2d 844 (D.C. Cir. 1979).published(. . . (R)ules ordinarily look to the future and are applied prospectively only . . . .)
- Citizens to Save Spencer Cnty. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 600 F.2d 844 (D.C. Cir. 1979).published(. [RJules ordinarily look to the future and are applied prospectively only . . . .)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“. . . (r)ules ordinarily look to the future and are applied prospectively only . . . .”
- Citizens to Save Spencer Cnty. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Alabama Power Co., Am. Petroleum Inst., Sierra Club, Bf Goodrich Co., Am. Paper Inst., Hoosier Energy Div., Mountain Fuel Supply Co., Montana Power Co., Nat. Resources Council of Maine, Pittston Co., Intervenors. Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, U. S. Env't Prot. Agency N. Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Montana Power Co., Intervenors. Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, U. S. Env't Prot. Agency, Nat. Resources Council of Maine, Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, U. S. Env't Prot. Agency, the Bf Goodrich Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Hampton Roads Energy Co. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Env't Prot. Agency, N. Cheyenne Tribe, Sierra Club, & Friends of the Earth v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, the Montana Power Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, N. Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Pittston Co., Colorado Interstate Gas Co., Ideal Basic Indus., Inc., Intervenors. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, the Pittston Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Am. Paper Inst. & the Nat'l Forest Prods. Ass'n v. United States Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Mfg. Chemists Ass'n, Chem. Prods. Corp., Dow Chem. Co., Fmc Corp., Monsanto Co., Ppg Indus., Inc., Rohm & Haas Co., Stauffer Chem. Co., Union Carbide Corp., Allied Chem. Corp. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Alabama By-Prods. Corp. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, Koppers Co., Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r of Epa, Usm Corp. v. Env't Prot. Agency & Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, Epa, 600 F.2d 844 (D.C. Cir. 1979).published“. . . (r)ules ordinarily look to the future and are applied prospectively only . . . .”
- Citizens to Save Spencer Cnty. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 600 F.2d 844 (D.C. Cir. 1979).published“. rjules ordinarily look to the future and are applied prospectively only . . . .”
“variant provisions appear necessary to preserve the reasonableness of the standards as a whole . . . (T)he record does not support the 'never to be exceeded' standard currently in force”
- Marathon Oil Co., Union Oil Co. of California, Atl. Richfield Co., & Mobil Oil Corp. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Shell Oil Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Marathon Oil Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 564 F.2d 1253 (9th Cir. 1977).published“variant provisions appear necessary to preserve the reasonableness of the standards as a whole . . . (T)he record does not support the 'never to be exceeded' standard currently in force”
- Marathon Oil Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 564 F.2d 1253 (9th Cir. 1977).published“variant provisions appear necessary to preserve the reasonableness of the standards as a whole . [T]he record does not support the ‘never to be exceeded’ standard currently in force”
Other citing cases
- A-T-O, Inc. v. Pension Benefit Guar. Corp., 634 F.2d 1013 (6th Cir. 1980).published
- Hercules Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 598 F.2d 91 (D.C. Cir. 1978).published
- Hercules Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Velsicol Chem. Corp. v. Douglas M. Costle, Adm'r, United States Env't Prot. Agency, 598 F.2d 91 (D.C. Cir. 1978).published
- Nat'l Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. Food & Drug Admin., 504 F.2d 761 (2d Cir. 1975).published
- Nat'l Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. Food & Drug Admin., 504 F.2d 761 (2d Cir. 1974).published
- Modine Mfg. Corp. v. Morris Kay, 791 F.2d 267 (3d Cir. 1986).published
- Modine Mfg. Corp. v. Kay, 791 F.2d 267 (3d Cir. 1986).published
- Charles R. Hassinger, Adm'r of the Est. of Stanley H. Hassinger, III Janet Mead Proctor, Adm'x of the Est. of Robert Diego Proctor & James B. Powell, Adm'r of the Est. of Stuart L. Powell v. Tideland Elec. Membership Corp., & Coleman Co., Inc. & Coast Catamaran Corp., Charles R. Hassinger, Adm'r of the Est. of Stanley H. Hassinger, III Janet Meade Proctor, Adm'x of the Est. of Robert Diego Proctor & James B. Powell, Adm'r of the Est. of Stuart L. Powell v. Tideland Elec. Membership Corp., & Coleman Co., Inc. & Coast Catamaran Corp., 781 F.2d 1022 (4th Cir. 1986).published
- Indep. Cosmetic Mfrs. & Distributors, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Health, Educ. & Welfare, United States Food & Drug Admin. & Donald Kennedy, Comm'r of Food & Drug Admin., Indep. Cosmetic Mfrs. & Distributors, Inc. v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 574 F.2d 553 (D.C. Cir. 1978).published
- Indep. Cosmetic Mfrs. & Distributors, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 574 F.2d 553 (D.C. Cir. 1978).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PBW Stock Exchange, Inc.
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
No. 73-1134.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 29, 1974.
Published opinion
416 U.S. 969
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2) · D.C. Circuit (2)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.