United States v. Jose Santiago-Ramirez, 531 F. App'x 789 (9th Cir. 2013). · Go Syfert
United States v. Jose Santiago-Ramirez, 531 F. App'x 789 (9th Cir. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jose Enrique SANTIAGO-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant
12-30178.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jun 21, 2013.
Unpublished opinion
531 F. App'x 789
Leif Johnson, Assistant U.S., USBI-Of-fice of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, Bryan R. Whittaker, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorneys, Helena, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Steven C. Babcock, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FDMT-Federal Defenders of Montana, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Tallman, Smith, Hurwitz.
Unpublished

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Enrique Santiago-Ramirez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Santiago-Ramirez argues that the district court erred procedurally by finding him ineligible for safety valve relief. We review for clear error, see United States v. Mejia-Pimental, 477 F.3d 1100, 1103 (9th Cir.2007), and find none. The record supports an inference that Santiago failed to provide the government with all of the information that he had concerning the offense. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5); U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(5); United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996) (“In determining whether [the defendant] had been truthful and completely forthcoming with information concerning the offense, the district court could consider information learned from other sources which indicated that [the defendant] had been less than forthcoming.”).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.