State v. Arellano-Sanchez (2021)
green
· 35 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 7 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2021 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
202120232026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State v. Trenary-Brown (2021)
However, “[c]oncurrence instructions are necessitated when single inci- dents give rise to separate and distinct injuries, but not when a single incident results in a cluster of injuries.” Arellano-Sanchez, 309 Or App at 85 (internal quotation marks omitted).
internal quotation marks omitted
green
State v. Leyva (2024)
State v. Arellano-Sanchez, 309 Or App 72, 80, 85 , 481 P3d 349 , rev den, 368 Or 511 (2021).
green
State v. Starr (2025)
See State v. Arellano-Sanchez, 309 Or App 72, 80 , 481 P3d 349 , rev den, 368 Or 511 (2021) (jury concurrence required “when the state presents evidence of multiple factual occurrences which could each independently support a guilty verdict on a single charge” but not where the evidence shows one continuous assaultive event).
jury concurrence required “when the state presents evidence of multiple factual occurrences which could each independently support a guilty verdict on a single charge” but not where the evidence shows one continuous assaultive event
green
State v. Starr (2025)
See State v. Arellano-Sanchez, 309 Or App 72, 80 , 481 P3d 349 , rev den, 368 Or 511 (2021) (jury concurrence required “when the state presents evidence of multiple factual occurrences which could each independently support a guilty verdict on a single charge” but not where the evidence shows one continuous assaultive event).
jury concurrence required “when the state presents evidence of multiple factual occurrences which could each independently support a guilty verdict on a single charge” but not where the evidence shows one continuous assaultive event
green
State v. Diaz-Briceno (2026)
See State v. Arrellano-Sanchez, 309 Or App 72, 86 , 481 P3d 349 , rev den, 368 Or 511 (2021) (concluding that a concurrence instruction was not required because “based on th[e] record, we [did] not perceive that the jury would be confused, or in potential disagreement, as to what defendant did”).
concluding that a concurrence instruction was not required because “based on th[e] record, we [did] not perceive that the jury would be confused, or in potential disagreement, as to what defendant did”
green
State v. Camphouse (2021)
See Arellano-Sanchez, 309 Or App at 83-84 .
green
State v. Freeman (2026)
Compare Arellano-Sanchez, 309 Or App at 85-86 (no concurrence instruction required where the defendant and the victim engaged in continuous, unbroken combat for less than five minutes and the complainant had a cluster of knife wounds), with Theriault, 300 Or App at 252-53 (concurrence instruction required where the defendant assaulted the victim repeatedly over a one-to-two-hour period, including pushing, choking, and punching her at various points; he did so both inside and…
no concurrence instruction required where the defendant and the victim engaged in continuous, unbroken combat for less than five minutes and the complainant had a cluster of knife wounds