How cited: State Ex Rel. Department of Community Affairs v. Utah Merit System Council · Go Syfert

State Ex Rel. Department of Community Affairs v. Utah Merit System Council (1980)

green · 15 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · Utah Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Department of Community Affairs v. Merit System Council, 614 P.2d 1259, 1263 (Utah 1980).
green Nelson v. City of Orem (2013)
Rule Authority · Utah
Council, 614 P.2d 1259, 1262 (Utah 1980). 40 Bunnell, 740 P.2d at 1333 n.1; see also V-1 Oil Co. v. Dep’t of Envtl.
green Nelson v. City of Orem (2013)
Rule Authority · Utah
Council, 614 P.2d 1259, 1262 (Utah 1980). 40 . - Bunnell, 740 P.2d at 1333 n. 1; see also V-1 Oil Co. v. Dep't of Envtl.
Rule Authority · Utah Ct. App.
Council, 614 P.2d 1259, 1261 (Utah 1980) (although record was deficient due to loss of witness’s testimony, resulting from tape recorder malfunction, affidavits cured defect); Tolman, 818 P.2d at 27 -28 n. 5 (stating while minor omissions in transcript may be inconsequential or may be corrected through affidavits, numerous omissions from transcript constitute grounds for new hearing). ¶ 12 The purpose of recording and maintaining a record of a hearing “is to allow both for p…
although record was deficient due to loss of witness’s testimony, resulting from tape recorder malfunction, affidavits cured defect
Rule Authority · Utah Ct. App.
Council, 614 P.2d 1259, 1262 (Utah 1980)).
Rule Authority · Utah
Council, 614 P.2d 1259, 1261 (Utah 1980) (supplementing administrative record where witness’ testimony went unrecorded due to tape recorder malfunction).
supplementing administrative record where witness’ testimony went unrecorded due to tape recorder malfunction
Rule Authority · Utah
Council, 614 P.2d 1259, 1263 (Utah 1980).
Rule Authority · Utah Ct. App.
Department of Community Affairs v. Utah Merit System Council, 614 P.2d 1259, 1263 (Utah 1980) (holding procedural rules "cannot be ignored or followed by the agency to suit its own purposes").
holding procedural rules "cannot be ignored or followed by the agency to suit its own purposes"
Rule Authority · Utah Ct. App.
While minor omissions may be inconsequential or may be corrected through affidavits, Department of Community Affairs v. Utah Merit System Council, 614 P.2d 1259, 1261 (Utah 1980), the numerous omissions from the present transcript leaves us without any confidence that the record is in fact a true record of the proceedings.
Rule Authority · Utah Ct. App.
In State Dep’t of Community Affairs v. Utah Merit System Council, 614 P.2d 1259, 1262 (Utah 1980) (citation omitted), our supreme court said: The necessity of preserving fundamental requirements of procedural fairness in administrative hearings was stated in Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville R.R.
citation omitted
Cited · Utah Ct. App. · signal: see
See State Dep’t. of Community Affairs v. Utah Merit System Council, 614 P.2d 1259, 1262 (Utah 1980).