Cluster 1191663
green
· 20 citation events
across 7 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Areas Pension Fund v. Int’l Comfort Prods., LLC, 585 F.3d 281, 284 (6th Cir. 2009).
Areas Pension Fund v. Int’l Comfort Prods., LLC, 585 F.3d 281, 286 (6th Cir. 2009).
green
Dairy v. Dairy Employees Union Local No. 17 Christian Labor Ass'n of the United States of America Pension Tru… (2015)
States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Int’l Comfort Prods., LLC, 585 F.3d 281, 284-285 (6th Cir.2009) (citing Carriers Container Council, Inc., 896 F.2d at 1343).
green
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. International Comfort Products, LLC (2011)
Drawing upon ERISA’s general definition of “employer,” the Sixth Circuit held that an “employer,” for the purposes of the MPPAA, is “a person who is obligated to contribute to a plan either as a direct employer or in the interest of an employer of the plan’s participants.” Int’l Comfort, 585 F.3d at 284 (quotation marks omitted).
quotation marks omitted
Areas Pension Fund v. Int’l Comfort Prods., *852 LLC, 585 F.3d 281, 284-85 (6th Cir.2009). 4 There is no question that M & M was the signatory entity and Simas Floor was not.