State v. Jennings (1997)
green
· 85 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199920122026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Derichsweiler v. State (2009)
In any event, the evidence establishes that the parking lots was public places. [1] There is no issue here as to anonymity of the tipster as in State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933-34 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, no pet.), cited by the majority.
green
Boyett v. State (2016)
They include those collectively known by the officers or agents cooperating together at the time of the detention.” State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, no pet.); see also Derichsweiler v. State, 348 S.W.3d 906, 914 (Tex.Crim.App.2011) (“[T]he detaining officer need not be personally aware of every fact that objectively supports a reasonable suspicion to detain; rather, ‘the cumulative information known to the cooperating officers at the time of th…
green
Brandon Brown v. State (2018)
Boyett v. State, 485 S.W.3d 581, 590 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2016, pet. ref’d) (quoting State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, no pet.) (citations omitted)).
green
Deborah Jane Kirby v. State (2011)
It is not enough to merely show that a stop was made because another officer requested it. 5 State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex. App.––Amarillo 1997, no pet.) (citations omitted) (concluding trial court did not err in suppressing evidence because requesting officer lacked reasonable suspicion).
green
State v. 1998 TOYOTA LAND CRUISER (2009)
See Hall v. State, 74 S.W.3d 521, 525 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2002, no pet.) (defining reasonable suspicion as the presence of articulable facts which, when combined with rational inferences therefrom, would allow an officer to reasonably suspect that a particular person has engaged, or is or soon will be engaging, in criminal activity); State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, no pet.) (stating that reasonable suspicion arises when the circumstances depict…
green
Christopher Joseph Hadley v. State (2006)
As Appellant points out, the court in State v. Jennings observed that “both the trial and reviewing courts must proceed cautiously when it appears that the detaining officer acted upon nothing other than a radio dispatch or request to apprehend.” 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, no pet.) (emphasis in original).
green
Young v. State (2004)
Id.; State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex.App.Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Oliver Eugene Evans, Jr. v. the State of Texas (2026)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, no pet.) (citing Rance v. State, 815 S.W.2d 622 , 635 n.2 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)).
green
Oliver Eugene Evans, Jr. v. the State of Texas (2026)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, no pet.) (citing Rance v. State, 815 S.W.2d 622 , 635 n.2 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).
green
Ricks, Cedric Allen (2015)
In State v Jennings, 958 S.W. 2d 930, 932 (Tex. App. - - Amarillo 1997, no pet.) a peace officer was dispatched to a domestic disturbance in the City of Plainview. 958 S.W. 2d at 932.
green
Emily Kay Smirl v. State (2014)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
ORSAG v. State (2010)
See Glass v. State, 681 S.W.2d 599, 601 (Tex.Crim.App.1984); State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Christopher Lee Orsag v. State (2010)
App. 1984); State v. Jennings , 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
State v. 1998 Toyota Land Cruiser Oklahoma Tag CMN 633 VIN JT3HT05J9W0007179 (Cole Austin Donelson) (2009)
See Hall v. State , 74 S.W.3d 521, 525 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2002, no pet.) (defining reasonable suspicion as the presence of articulable facts which, when combined with rational inferences therefrom, would allow an officer to reasonably suspect that a particular person has engaged, or is or soon will be engaging, in criminal activity); State v. Jennings , 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 1997, no pet.) (stating that reasonable suspicion arises when the circumstances de…
green
State v. 1998 Toyota Land Cruiser Oklahoma Tag CMN 633 VIN JT3HT05J9W0007179 (Cole Austin Donelson) (2009)
See Hall v. State, 74 S.W.3d 521, 525 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2002, no pet.) (defining reasonable suspicion as the presence of articulable facts which, when combined with rational inferences therefrom, would allow an officer to reasonably suspect that a particular person has engaged, or is or soon will be engaging, in criminal activity); State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 1997, no pet.) (stating that reasonable suspicion arises when the circumstances depi…
green
John Raymond Sheffield v. State (2008)
State v. Jennings , 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
John Raymond Sheffield v. State (2008)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Arturo Lopez v. State (2006)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Lopez v. State (2006)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Arturo Lopez v. State (2006)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Benjamin Alonzo Zepeda v. State (2004)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App–Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Benjamin Alonzo Zepeda v. State (2004)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App–Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Benjamin Alonzo Zepeda v. State (2004)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App-Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Rafael Hernandez Gonzales v. State (2004)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Rafael Hernandez Gonzales v. State (2004)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Rafael Hernandez Gonzales v. State (2004)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Canava, Dante Alexander v. State (2003)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Doru Lung v. State (2001)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App.-- Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Nicholas Garrett v. State of Texas (2001)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App.-- Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Facundo Valdez v. State of Texas (2001)
State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
State v. Frank Bartow, Jr. (1999)
See Wright , 959 S.W.2d at 357 ; State v. Jennings , 958 S.W.2d 930, 932-33 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Martinez v. State (2010)
See State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930 , 933 n. 2 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, no pet.). [8] As reflected by the marked map, the area encompasses over fifteen city blocks. [9] Officer Hurley stopped a green Ford pickup. [10] Officer Hurley testified there were some vehicles out Sunday night, just not the same amount of traffic as earlier in the evening.
green
Mount v. State (2007)
See State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Castro v. State (2006)
See State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 1997, no pet.) (citing Fearance v. State, 771 S.W.2d 486, 509 (Tex. Crim.
green
Hector Castro v. State (2006)
See State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, no pet.) (citing Fearance v. State, 771 S.W.2d 486, 509 (Tex. Crim.
green
John David Martinez v. State (2010)
See State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930 , 933 n.2 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, no pet.). -6- DISSENTING OPINION TO DENIAL OF EN BANC CONSIDERATION 04-10-00204-CR & 04-09-00205-CR In this case Officer Hurley was required to provide articulable facts that would allow this court to determine the circumstances upon which Hurley could reasonably conclude that Martinez actually had been engaged in criminal activity.
green
Leonard L. Martinez, Sr. v. State (2010)
See State v. Jennings , 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Martinez v. State (2010)
See State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex.App.Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Mark Derichsweiler v. State (2009)
See State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, no pet.) (noting that a reviewing court “must proceed cautiously when it appears that the detaining officer acted upon nothing other than a radio dispatch”); cf. Fearance v. State, 771 S.W.2d 486, 509 (Tex. Crim.
green
Mark Derichsweiler v. State (2009)
See State v. Jennings , 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1997, no pet.) (noting that a reviewing court “must proceed cautiously when it appears that the detaining officer acted upon nothing other than a radio dispatch”); cf. Fearance v. State , 771 S.W.2d 486, 509 (Tex. Crim.
green
Marlyn Solanas v. State (2007)
See State v. Jennings , 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Mike Seymour Mount v. State (2007)
See State v. Jennings , 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex. App. C Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
State v. Don Steven McDougal (2003)
See State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
State v. Don Steven McDougal (2003)
See State v. Jennings , 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
State v. Don Steven McDougal (2003)
See State v. Jennings , 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
State v. Don Steven McDougal (2003)
See State v. Jennings , 958 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Joe Louis Martinez v. State of Texas (2002)
See State v. Jennings , 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Joe Louis Martinez v. State of Texas (2002)
See State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Martinez v. State (2002)
See State v. Jennings, 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, no pet.).
green
Joe Louis Martinez v. State of Texas (2002)
See State v. Jennings , 958 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1997, no pet.).