How cited: In Re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust · Go Syfert

In Re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust (2008)

green · 84 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 29 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200820172026
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 6 citations in this opinion
App.—San Antonio 1960, no writ). [13] In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust , 261 S.W.3d 111, 120 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 476 (8th ed. 2004)). [14] Id. [15] Cavanaugh v. Davis , 149 Tex. 573, 576 , 235 S.W.2d 972 , 973–74 (1951); see also Cubley v. Barbee , 123 Tex. 411, 432 , 73 S.W.2d 72, 83 (1934). [16] Jones v. Guy , 135 Tex. 398, 402 , 143 S.W.2d 906, 908 (1940). [17] In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust , 261 S.W.3d at…
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 4 citations in this opinion
San Antonio Area Found. v. Lang, 35 S.W.3d 636, 639 (Tex.2000); In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2008, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
App.—San Antonio 1960, no writ). 13 In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 120 (Tex. App.— San Antonio 2008, pet. denied) (quoting Black‘s Law Dictionary 476 (8th ed. 2004)). 14 Id. 8 No one contends that Pam and Scott were legally adopted.
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied); see San Antonio Area Found. v. Lang, 35 S.W.3d 636 (Tex. 2000) (construction of will).
construction of will
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
San Antonio Area Found. v. Lang , 35 S.W.3d 636, 639 (Tex. 2000); In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust , 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 20 08, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Nail v. Thompson, 806 S.W.2d 599, 600 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, no writ) (stating that to determine who should take under a testamentary trust, a court looks to the state of the law at the time the settlor died in conjunction with the language of the trust instrument); In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Tr., 261 S.W.3d 111, 118 (Tex. App.— San Antonio 2008, pet. denied) (“[I]n interpreting the trust, we look to the law as it existed at the time the trust was executed.”); …
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
In re Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied); San Antonio Area Found[.] v. Lang, 35 S.W.3d 636, 639 (Tex. 2000).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Construction of Wills and Trusts “The same rules of construction apply to both wills and trusts.” In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied); see also San Antonio Area Found. v. Lang, 35 S.W.3d 636, 639 (Tex. 2000) (construction of will).
construction of will
Rule Authority · Del. Ch.
TT 96-97. 64 TT 125. 65 Ex. 15. 66 Ex. 16. 67 Id. 68 See In re Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex. App. 2008).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 2008, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Soefê, 270 S.W.3d at 628 (applying San Antonio Area Found. v. Lang, 35 S.W.3d 636, 639 (Tex. 2000)); see Eckels, 111 S.W.3d at 694 ; Hurley,98 S.W.3d at 310. "lf, on the other hand, the meaning of the instrument is uncertain or reasonably susceptible to more than one meaning, the instrument is ambiguous." In re Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 2008, pet. denied); Eckels, 111 S.W.3d at 694 (internal quote omitted). ïhe determination of w…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Id. at 807-08; see also Mitchell v. Mitchell, 157 Tex. 346 , 303 S.W.2d 352, 353-54 (1957); In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied).
green Benavides v. Mathis (2014)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Id. at 807-08; see also Mitchell v. Mitchell, 157 Tex. 346 , 303 S.W.2d 352, 353-54 (1957); In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2008, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
In construing the Will, we apply the same rules of construction used for trusts, In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
If, on the other hand, the meaning of the instrument is uncertain or “reasonably susceptible to more than one meaning,” the instrument is ambiguous; In re Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied) (quoting Eckels, 111 S.W.3d at 694 )), and evidence of the grantor’s situation, the surrounding circumstances and like indicia which enable the court to place itself in the testator’s shoes at the time the document was executed may be…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
If, on the other hand, the meaning of the instrument is uncertain or "reasonably susceptible to more than one meaning," the instrument is ambiguous; In re Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex.App. -- San Antonio 2008, pet. denied) (quoting Eckels, 111 S.W.3d at 694 )), and evidence of the grantor's situation, the surrounding circumstances and like indicia which enable the court to place itself in the testator's shoes at the time the document was executed may…
green Humphries v. Humphries (2011)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
In re Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 116 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2008, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation Dist., 925 S.W.2d 618, 637 (Tex.1996); In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 126 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2008, pet. denied); City of Grey Forest v. Vernon, 254 S.W.3d 548, 554 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2008, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation Dist., 925 S.W.2d 618, 637 (Tex. 1996); In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 126 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied); City of Grey Forest v. Vernon, 254 S.W.3d 548, 554 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2008, pet. denied).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Although we agree that an award of attorney’s fees in a declaratory judgment action is not limited to a prevailing party, see In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 126-27 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied), we cannot predict whether the trial court would have exercised its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees in the same manner had it ruled differently on the merits of the declaratory relief claim.
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 116 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See generally In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 127 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2008, pet. denied) (“The Trustees have cited no authority for the proposition that it is unequitable and unjust to award attorney’s fees to parties who have had their fees paid up front by another party, subject to reimbursement.”).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See generally In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 127 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied) (“The Trustees have cited no authority for the proposition that it is unequitable and unjust to award attorney’s fees to parties who have had their fees paid up front by another party, subject to reimbursement.”).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See generally In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied) (when construing a trust document and seeking to ascertain its purposes, the court should be guided by the document itself).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See In re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied) (citing Eckels v. Davis, 111 S.W.3d 687, 694 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, pet. denied)).
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: compare
Compare In re Ellison Grandchildren Trust, 261 S.W.3d 111, 117 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2008, pet. denied) (construction of trust), and San Antonio Area Found v. Lang, 35 S.W.3d 636, 639 (Tex. 2000) (construction of will).
construction of will
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also
Even assuming that intent could be a relevant consideration in this context and that the communication at issue reveals an intent by Ives to agree to the adoption in order to facilitate the transfer of money from the trust to himself and then perhaps to Stephen, that information could not establish a prima facie case for fraud because the “adult adoption provisions appear to exist largely, if not entirely, for the purpose of creating heirship in non-family members for inheri…