Dibben v. Shelter Insurance Co. (2008)
green
· 73 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 38 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200820172026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)).
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008) (“In interpreting an insurance contract, we must endeavor to give each provision a reasonable meaning and to avoid an interpretation that renders some provisions useless or redundant.”).
“In interpreting an insurance contract, we must endeavor to give each provision a reasonable meaning and to avoid an interpretation that renders some provisions useless or redundant.”
green
AMCO Insurance Company v. Judith Williams (2017)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. App. 2008).
green
AMCO Insurance Company v. Judith Williams (2017)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. App. 2008).
green
Daughhetee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (2014)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.App.2008).
green
Joshua Munroe v. Continental Western Insurance (2013)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.App.2008).
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 557 (Mo.App.W.D.2008).
green
Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Morton (2015)
Courts must “endeavor to give each- provision a reasonable meaning and to avoid an interpretation that renders some provisions useless or redundant.” Dibben v. Shelter Ins Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct.App.2008).
green
Munroe v. Continental Western Insurance (2011)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.Ct.App.2008).
green
Parmelee v. Standard Fire Insurance Company (2010)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct.App.2008).
citations omitted
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)).
green
McGhee v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (2025)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
green
MAXLIFE, LLC v. Illinois Casualty Company (2023)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)).
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008) (explaining that when interpreting an insurance contract, the court must “endeavor to give each provision a reasonable meaning and to avoid an interpretation that renders some provisions useless or redundant.”).
explaining that when interpreting an insurance contract, the court must “endeavor to give each provision a reasonable meaning and to avoid an interpretation that renders some provisions useless or redundant.”
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
green
Reeves v. 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company (2022)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. App. 2008)).
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008). “[A]mbiguity exists where there is duplicity, indistinctness, or uncertainty in the meaning of the language in the policy.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008).
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008)).
green
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois v. Palazzolo (2020)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
green
Bradley Bearden v. Missouri Valley College (2020)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 555 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008)). 4 Because the circuit court addressed only Counts II and V, as they applied to MVC, in its partial summary judgment, Counts I, III, and IV were left to future determination.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
green
Dior v. American Family Insurance Company (2019)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008) (the court construes ambiguous provisions against the insurer).
the court construes ambiguous provisions against the insurer
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 557 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008)).
green
Maso v. Farmers Insurance (2016)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.Ct.App.2008)). “[T]he fact that a definition is clear and unambiguous does not necessarily end the inquiry as to the existence of an ambiguity.” Id. at 954 (citing Hughes, 712 F.3d at 399 ). “[I]f other policy provisions inject ambiguity into the meaning of [a term], then the policy remains ambiguous and must be construed against the insurer.” Id. (quoting Hughes, 712 F.3d at 399 ).
green
Jeffrey T. Blackwell v. CSF Properties 2 LLC (2014)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 555 (Mo.App.
green
Jaudes v. Progressive Preferred Insurance (2014)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.Ct.App.2008). “‘The key is whether the contract language is ambiguous or unambiguous.’ ” Todd, 223 S.W.3d at 160 (quoting Peters v. Emp’rs Mut.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.App.
green
Fischer v. First American Title Insurance Co. (2012)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 557 (Mo.App.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.Ct.App.2008).
green
Dallas v. American General Life & Accident Insurance (2012)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.Ct.App.2008).
green
Lero v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (2011)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.App.2008).
green
National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Maune (2009)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.App.
green
Estate of Anderson v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Illinois (2008)
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 557-58 (Mo.App.