How cited: Dibben v. Shelter Insurance Co. · Go Syfert

Dibben v. Shelter Insurance Co. (2008)

green · 73 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 38 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200820172026
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)).
Quote Authority · 8th Cir.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008) (“In interpreting an insurance contract, we must endeavor to give each provision a reasonable meaning and to avoid an interpretation that renders some provisions useless or redundant.”).
“In interpreting an insurance contract, we must endeavor to give each provision a reasonable meaning and to avoid an interpretation that renders some provisions useless or redundant.”
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. App. 2008).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. App. 2008).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.App.2008).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.App.2008).
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App. · 7 citations in this opinion
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 557 (Mo.App.W.D.2008).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo. · 2 citations in this opinion
Courts must “endeavor to give each- provision a reasonable meaning and to avoid an interpretation that renders some provisions useless or redundant.” Dibben v. Shelter Ins Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct.App.2008).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.Ct.App.2008).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct.App.2008).
citations omitted
Rule Authority · W.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008) (explaining that when interpreting an insurance contract, the court must “endeavor to give each provision a reasonable meaning and to avoid an interpretation that renders some provisions useless or redundant.”).
explaining that when interpreting an insurance contract, the court must “endeavor to give each provision a reasonable meaning and to avoid an interpretation that renders some provisions useless or redundant.”
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. App. 2008)).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Rule Authority · W.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008). “[A]mbiguity exists where there is duplicity, indistinctness, or uncertainty in the meaning of the language in the policy.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008).
Rule Authority · W.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008)).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 555 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008)). 4 Because the circuit court addressed only Counts II and V, as they applied to MVC, in its partial summary judgment, Counts I, III, and IV were left to future determination.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008) (the court construes ambiguous provisions against the insurer).
the court construes ambiguous provisions against the insurer
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 557 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008)).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.Ct.App.2008)). “[T]he fact that a definition is clear and unambiguous does not necessarily end the inquiry as to the existence of an ambiguity.” Id. at 954 (citing Hughes, 712 F.3d at 399 ). “[I]f other policy provisions inject ambiguity into the meaning of [a term], then the policy remains ambiguous and must be construed against the insurer.” Id. (quoting Hughes, 712 F.3d at 399 ).
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 555 (Mo.App.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.Ct.App.2008). “‘The key is whether the contract language is ambiguous or unambiguous.’ ” Todd, 223 S.W.3d at 160 (quoting Peters v. Emp’rs Mut.
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.App.
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 557 (Mo.App.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.Ct.App.2008).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.Ct.App.2008).
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.App.2008).
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 556 (Mo.App.
Rule Authority · W.D. Mo.
Co., 261 S.W.3d 553, 557-58 (Mo.App.