In Re Vogel (2008)
green
· 120 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200920172026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
in the Interest of K.D.H., a Child (2014)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 920 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
green
in the Interest of K.D.H., a Child (2014)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 920 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
green
In Re Cervantes (2009)
See In re Kelso, 266 S.W.3d 586, 590 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, orig. proceeding); In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 920-21 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
green
Rolle v. Hardy (2017)
Mauldin, 428 S.W.3d at 263 ; In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 921 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding) (standing is determined as of time that suit was filed in trial court).
green
Cassandra Donetta Medrano v. Lydia Serna Zapata (2013)
Cf. In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 920 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding) (example of grandparent-standing issue being raised through mandamus challenge to temporary orders). 8 00215-CV, 1997 Tex. App. LEXIS 4715 , at *6 n.2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1997, no pet.) (not designated for publication) (noting conservatorship issues were not mooted when child reached eighteen because dispute encompassed claim for reimbursement of expenses incurred during c…
green
In Re RTK (2010)
Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 156.101(a) (Vernon Supp. 2009); In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 923 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding); C.A.M.M., 243 S.W.3d at 216 .
green
in the Interest of R.T.K. (2010)
Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 156.101(a) (Vernon Supp. 2009); In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 923 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding); C.A.M.M., 243 S.W.3d at 216 .
green
In Re SMD (2010)
Anderson Cancer Ctr. v. Novak, 52 S.W.3d 704, 708 (Tex.2001); In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 921 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
green
in the Interest of S.M.D., a Child (2010)
Anderson Cancer Ctr. v. Novak, 52 S.W.3d 704, 708 (Tex.2001); In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 921 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
“A ‘modification suit’ refers to an action in which a party attempts to effectuate a change in visitation rights following the entry of an initial custody order.” In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 922 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding); see Tex. Fam.
green
in the Interest of M.L.R.S., a Child (2022)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 925 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
green
In the Interest of K.S. (2016)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 921 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.).
green
in Re Joseph Andre Davis (2015)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 921 (Tex.App.—Houston 12 Id. [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding). 13 15 See In re M.N.G., 113 S.W.3d 27 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth 153 S.W.3d 132, 137 (Tex.App. – San Antonio, 2004, no 2003, no pet.). pet). 2 lived with the grandparents under their care, (2) both parents, the custody, and control since birth.
green
in the Interest of A.B.O. and E.B.O., Children (2015)
In the Interest of V.L.K., 24 S.W.3d 338, 342 (Tex. 2000); In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 923 (Tex. App. – Houston [14th] 2008, original proceeding); Mauldin v. Clements, 428 S.W.3d 247, 267 (Tex. App. – Houston [1st] 2014, no pet.).
green
in the Interest of N.L.D., a Child (2013)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 921 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 925 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
Code § 156.101(a); Johnson, 681 S.W.3d at 439 (stating that “party seeking modification must establish these elements by a preponderance of the evidence”); In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 923 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding) (explaining that in modification proceeding “in which the parental presumption does not apply,” movant “need demonstrate only that modification would be in [the child’s] best interest and that the circumstances have ‘materially and su…
green
In Re Callan Marine, Ltd. v. the State of Texas (2024)
Co. of Am., 485 S.W.3d 921, 925 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2016, orig. proceeding); In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 920 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
green
In Re C.J.S., a Child v. the State of Texas (2024)
Custody disputes “are inherently fact-intensive” and we “routinely defer to the fact finder in matters of credibility and demeanor[.]” In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 925 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.).
green
Kahrim A. Bridges v. Carol Ann Pugh (2023)
CODE § 102.004(a)(1). “‘[P]hysical abuse, severe neglect, abandonment, drug or alcohol abuse, or immoral behavior on the part of the parent are all factors the trial court may consider in assessing significant impairment.” L.D.F., 445 S.W.3d at 830 ; see Compton, 428 S.W.3d at 884–85 (considering grandmother’s evidence of parent’s “drug use, recent criminal arrests, and extreme neglect of her children during the preceding eight months” as factors relevant to standing analysi…
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 920 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
Anderson Cancer Ctr. v. Novak, 52 S.W.3d 704, 708 (Tex. 2001); In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 921 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
green
James Rutherford v. 6353 Joint Venture (2017)
Martin v. Clinical Pathology Lab., Inc., 343 S.W.3d 885, 888 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2011, pet. denied); In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 921 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. 3 proceeding).
green
In the Interest of J.R.P. (2017)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 924 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.], 2008, orig. proceeding) (“trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying sole managing conservatorship to a parent with alcohol problems”).
green
Tracie Jackson v. NAACP Houston Branch and Yolanda Smith ( in Her Official Capacity) and National Association… (2016)
See Tex. Ass’n of Bus. v. Tex. Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440 , 446 n.9 (Tex. 1993); In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 921 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.).
green
in Re: Charles Dwayne Lankford and Roberta Gresham (2015)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 920 (Tex. JUDGES: Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice.
green
in Re Andrea Hogard (2013)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 921-22 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
See N.L.D., 344 S.W.3d at 38–39 (parent failed to submit to drug test, left messages suggesting current drug use, admitted to past methamphetamine use, left child at grandparent’s house without food or diapers, failed to take child to doctor although child had heart condition, and mother was physically abusive toward father); In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 920, 922 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.) (grandmother demonstrated that father was alcoholic, removed child…
green
in the Interest of A.C.F.H., and D.A.B.H., Children (2012)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 920 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding); In re SSJ-J, 153 S.W.3d 132, 134 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2004, no pet.).
green
in Re Michelle Chester, Relator (2011)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 922 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
green
In re Chester (2011)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 922 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
Tex. Dep’t of Transp. v. City of Sunset Valley, 146 S.W.3d 637, 646 (Tex.2004); In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 920-21 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
green
in the Interest of C.A.H., a Child (2011)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 920 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding); In re SSJ-J, 153 S.W.3d 132, 134 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2004, no pet.).
green
in the Interest of M.L.C., a Child (2010)
Code § 102.004(a)(1); [7] In re Vogel , 261 S.W.3d 917, 921 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding); cf. In re Derzapf , 219 S.W.3d 327, 332, n.10 (Tex. 2007) (noting that suits for grandparent access are governed by chapter 153, which has different standing requirements than grandparent suits for conservatorship).
noting that suits for grandparent access are governed by chapter 153, which has different standing requirements than grandparent suits for conservatorship
green
Ann E. Van Heerden v. Casper J. Van Heerden (2010)
In re Vogel , 261 S.W.3d 917, 925 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.).
green
Van Heerden v. Van Heerden (2010)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 925 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.).
green
Wallace v. Perry (In Re Perry) (2010)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 921 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, pet. denied); Tex. Ass’n of Bus. v. Tex. Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440 , 446 n. 9 (Tex.1993).
green
Chenault v. Banks (2009)
In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 920 (Tex.App-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
green
Deborah Chenault F/K/A Deborah Paul v. Patricia Banks, Independent for the Estate of Horace A. Paul Jr. (2009)
In re Vogel , 261 S.W.3d 917, 920 (Tex. App. C Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
green
Rebecca Svoboda v. Larry Svoboda and Maggie Svoboda (2009)
See In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 922 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.) (citing Texas Ass’n of Bus. v. Texas Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440 , 446 n.9 (Tex. 1993)).
green
Rebecca Svoboda v. Larry Svoboda and Maggie Svoboda (2009)
See In re Vogel , 261 S.W.3d 917, 922 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.) (citing Texas Ass'n of Bus. v. Texas Air Control Bd. , 852 S.W.2d 440 , 446 n.9 (Tex. 1993)).
green
Romie Richardson v. the State of Texas (2026)
See In re A.J.R.B., No. 10-24-00177-CV, 2024 WL 5088043 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Waco Dec. 12, 2024, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“In evaluating the trial court’s exercise of discretion, we defer to the trial court’s resolution of underlying facts and credibility determinations, and we do not substitute our own judgment in its place.” (citing In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 925 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding)).
See In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 922 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding) (holding grandmother had standing to petition for managing conservatorship of her grandson when she presented proof that father was a long-time alcoholic, testimony showed it would be “harmful” for child to live with father, father conceded he could not financially provide for the child at the time, and father had removed the child from the mother’s funeral and left him in the care o…
Frost Nat’l Bank v. Fernandez, 315 S.W.3d 494, 502 (Tex. 2010), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1180 (2011); see also In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 920 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
green
in the Interest of J.A.T., a Minor Child (2016)
Code AnN. § 102.003(b) (emphasis added); see also In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 921 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.) (orig. proceeding) (stating that standing to file suit is determined as of the time the suit was filed (citing Tex. Ass’n of Bus. v. Tex. Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440 , 446 n. 9 (Tex.1993))).
green
In re Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America (2016)
Luxenberg v. Marshall, 835 S.W.2d 136, 142 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1992, orig. proceeding); see also In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 920 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist] 2008, orig. proceeding); In re ExxonMobil Corp., 97 S.W.3d 353 , 358 n. 5 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, orig. proceeding).
Anderson Cancer Ctr. v. Novak, 52 S.W.3d 704, 708 (Tex. 2001); see In re Vogel, 261 S.W.3d 917, 921 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding).
green
in the Interest of E.C., a Child (2014)
Several Texas courts have addressed this issue and held that standing relates to “the child’s circumstances on the date suit was filed.” K.D.H., 426 S.W.3d at 888 (emphasis added); see In re McDaniel, 408 S.W.3d 389, 397 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, orig. proceeding); see Vogel, 261 S.W.3d at 922 .
green
in the Interest of E.C., a Child (2014)
Several Texas courts have addressed this issue and held that standing relates to “the child’s circumstances on the date suit was filed.” K.D.H., 426 S.W.3d at 888 (emphasis added); see In re McDaniel, 408 S.W.3d 389, 397 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, orig. proceeding); see Vogel, 261 S.W.3d at 922 .
green
in Re: John Doe (2011)
See In re Vogel , 261 S.W.3d 917, 920 (Tex. App.–Houston 14th Dist. 2008, orig. proceeding); Luxenberg v. Marshall , 835 S.W.2d 136, 141-42 (Tex. App.–Dallas 1992, orig. proceeding).