How cited: In Re the Guardianship of Fortenberry · Go Syfert

In Re the Guardianship of Fortenberry (2008)

green · 17 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 14 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Guardianship of Macer, 558 S.W.3d 222 , 227–28 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2018, no pet.) (holding that reimbursement of fees incurred as ward’s attorney-in-fact prior to guardianship are recoverable as claims against the guardianship estate if timely submitted and proved as such but not as expenses of the guardianship estate administration); Guardianship of Fortenberry, 261 S.W.3d 904, 913 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.); see also Tex. Est.
Rule Authority · N.D. Cal.
In re Guardianship of Fortenberry, 261 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex.App.2008).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
In re Guardianship of Fortenberry, 261 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
If . . . the court is not convinced that the claim is just, the court shall disapprove the claim.‖). 41 See In re Guardianship of Fortenberry, 261 S.W.3d 904, 914 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.). 42 See Tex. R.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
If . . . the court is not convinced that the claim is just, the court shall disapprove the claim.”). [41] See In re Guardianship of Fortenberry , 261 S.W.3d 904, 914 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.). [42] See Tex. R.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
In re Fortenberry, 261 S.W.3d 904, 909-10 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, no pet.); see also In re W.E.R., 669 S.W.2d 716, 716 (Tex.1984) (per curiam); John A. Broderick, Inc. v. Kaye Bassman Intern.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Case law provides "oral comments from the bench ‘do not constitute findings of fact and conclusions of law.’ " In re Fortenberry, 261 S.W.3d 904, 909-10 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, no pet.) (quoting Sharp v. Hobart Corp., 957 S.W.2d 650 , 652 n. 5 (Tex.App.-Austin 1997, no pet.) and’ citing In re W.E.R., 669 S.W.2d 716, 716 (Tex.1984)).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
In re Guardianship of Fortenberry, 261 S.W.3d 904, 910 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
CODE ANN . § 665B(a) (Vernon 2009); In re Guardianship of Fortenberry, 261 S.W.3d 904, 914 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.); Meduna, 2003 WL 124214 at *2.
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
City of San Antonio v. City of Boeme, 111 S.W.3d 22, 25 (Tex. 2008); In re Guardianship of Fortenberry, 261 S.W.3d 904, 910 (TexApp.-Dallas 2008, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
BMC Software Belgium, N.V. v. Marchand, 83 S.W.3d 789, 794-95 (Tex.2002); In re Guardianship of Fortenberry, 261 S.W.3d 904, 910 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, no pet.).
Rule Authority · Bankr. D. Md.
In re Guardianship of Fortenberry, 261 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex.App.), quoting Vortt Exploration Co. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 787 S.W.2d 942, 944 (Tex.1990). 15.
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
CODE ANN. § 665B(a) (West Supp. 2012); see In re Guardianship of Fortenberry, 261 S.W.3d 904, 912 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.).
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: accord
“Accordingly, where the facts are undisputed and the only matters presented on appeal are legal issues to be reviewed de novo, the failure to file findings of fact and conclusions of law is harmless error.” Id.; accord In re Fortenberry, 261 S.W.3d 904, 910 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.). –7– In the case before us, the Santiagos do not describe, and the record does not show, any facts that were disputed at trial.