Amos v. State (1991)
green
· 107 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199220092026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Fuller v. State (1992)
Dr. Grigson's usual opinion is "[t]hat most certainly an individual such as you described [in a hypothetical question based on defendant's criminal history and the evidence presented in that case] is going to be a threat to people in our society no matter where they are, whether in confinement or in the free world." Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 162 (Tex.Cr.App.1991).
green
Alexander Nathaniel Brenes v. State (2015)
App. P. 38.2(a)(1)(A), the list of parties and counsel is not required to supplement or correct the appellant’s list. -i- TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO.: IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . i TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii INDEX OF AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv STATEMENT OF THE CASE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMEN…
green
State v. Elias (2011)
App.2006) (same); State v. Frierson, 926 So.2d 1139 (Fla.2006) (same); United States v. Simpson, 439 F.3d 490, 494-97 (C.A.8 2006) (same); Golphin v. State, 945 So.2d 1174, 1190-93 (Fla.2006) (same); State v. Martin, 285 Kan. 994, 1002-1005 , 179 P.3d 457, 462-64 (2008) (same); People v. Brendlin, 45 Cal.4th 262 , 195 P.3d 1074 , 85 Cal. Rptr.3d 496 (2008) (same). [36] Dix & Dawson, supra, at 779 n. 6 (quoting Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex. Crim.App.1991)).
"Appellant further argues that there was no concern that the evidence in the truck would be destroyed or lost because [appellant was] already in police custody. The automobile exception, however, does not require exigent circumstances."
green
Matthews v. State (2005)
Woolworth Co., Inc., 545 S.W.2d 596, 598 (Tex.Civ.App.-El Paso 1977, no writ); Richardson v. Walsh, 292 S.W.2d 855, 856 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1956, no writ). [31] Loera v. State, 14 S.W.3d 464, 468 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2000, no pet.); King v. State, 732 S.W.2d 796, 803 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1987, pet. ref'd). [32] Adkins v. State, 717 S.W.2d 363, 365-66 (Tex.Crim.App.1986). [33] See Snider v. State, 681 S.W.2d 60, 62-63 (Tex.Crim.App.1984); see also United States v. Watkins, …
green
Conde v. State (2004)
Courts determine probable cause for a warrantless search by assessing the “totality of the circumstances.” Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex.Crim.App.1991).
green
Rovnak v. State (1999)
A person who cannot assert a legitimate claim to a vehicle cannot reasonably expect that the vehicle is a private repository for his personal effects, whether or not they are enclosed in some sort of container, such as a paper bag." Id. at 119 (citing United States v. Hargrove, 647 F.2d 411, 413 (4th Cir.1981)). [44] See Longoria v. State, 747 S.W.2d 50, 52 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1988, no pet.) (citing Aldridge v. State, 482 S.W.2d 171, 174 (Tex. Crim.App.1972)). [45] Reyes v…
green
Lagrone v. State (1997)
Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 159-60 (Tex.Cr.App.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 917 , 112 S.Ct. 1959 , 118 L.Ed.2d 561 (1992).
green
Powell v. State (1995)
In the instant case, assuming arguendo, as appellant contends, that Judge Gist lacked authority to issue a search warrant to be executed in Orange County, the search of appellant’s motor home was nevertheless valid pursuant to the automobile exception to the warrant requirement. 4 See Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 160 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991).
green
Martinez v. State (1993)
Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 , 101 S.Ct. 1866 , 68 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981); Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 3383 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1090 (1983); Holloway v. State, 613 S.W.2d 497, 502-503 (Tex.Cr.App.1981); Fuller v. State, 829 S.W.2d 191, 195 (Tex.Cr.App.1992); Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 162 (Tex.Cr.
green
Tendo Edmond v. State (2019)
But see State v. Elias, 339 S.W.3d 667, 678 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (stating in dicta that “it could perhaps be debated whether the automobile exception to the warrant requirement ought properly to be applied” in case in which defendant was arrested before the search of his van) (citing Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex. Crim. 9 App. 1991 )); Amos, 810 S.W.2d at 161 (stating in dicta, “It may be that where police come upon an automobile that is parked, and a suspect is …
green
Elrod v. State (2017)
For instance, pursuant to the automobile exception, officers may conduct a warrantless search of an automobile readily capable of being used on a' public highway (1) if there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed; (2) if there is probable cause to believe contraband is located in the vehicle; and (3) “where it is not practicable to secure a warrant because the vehicle can be quickly moved out of the locality or jurisdiction in which the warrant must be…
green
Jacob Cory Gonzales v. State (2015)
Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 159-60 (Tex. Crim.
green
State of Texas v. Elias, Abran (2011)
Dix & Dawson, supra , at 779 n. 6 (quoting Amos v. State , 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)).
green
State of Texas v. Elias, Abran (2011)
First, it erred to affirm the trial court’s grant of the appellee’s suppression motion whether taint from illegal initial detention is attenuated by detaining officer’s subsequent discovery of outstanding arrest warrant); State v. Thompson, 231 Neb. 771, 777-78 , 438 N.W.2d 131, 136-37 (1989) (same); United States v. Green, 111 F.3d 515, 521-23 (CA7 1997) (same); State v. Hill, 725 So.2d 1282 (La. 1998) (same); State v. Jones, 270 Kan. 526 , 17 P.3d 359 (2001) (same); United…
green
Keehn, Darrell Jay (2009)
Id. at 616 n.3 (citing Maryland v. Dyson , 527 U.S. 465, 467 (1999); Amos v. State , 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex. Crim.
green
Keehn, Darrell Jay (2009)
App. 1991); Ramirez v. State, 105 S.W.3d 730, 745 (Tex. App.—Austin 2003, no pet.)). 10 Id. at 616 n.3 (citing Maryland v. Dyson, 527 U.S. 465, 467 (1999); Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex. Crim.
green
Keehn v. State (2009)
Id. at 616 n. 3 (citing Maryland v. Dyson, 527 U.S. 465, 467 , 119 S.Ct. 2013 , 144 L.Ed.2d 442 (1999); Amos v. Stale, 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex.Crim.App.1991)). 11 .
green
Andrew Wamsley v. State (2008)
App. 2007); Amos v. State , 819 S.W.2d 156, 160-61 (Tex. Crim.
green
Andrew Wamsley v. State (2008)
App. 2007); Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 160-61 (Tex. Crim.
green
Keehn v. State (2007)
See Maryland v. Dyson, 527 U.S. 465, 467 , 119 S.Ct. 2013, 2013 , 144 L.Ed.2d 442 (1999) (explaining that "If a car is readily mobile and probable cause exists to believe it contains contraband, the Fourth Amendment ... permits police to search the whole vehicle without more” and rejecting the proposition that exigent circumstances are necessary to trigger the "automobile exception” to the warrant requirement); Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex.Crim.App.1991) (holding …
green
Darrell Jay Keehn v. State (2007)
See Maryland v. Dyson , 527 U.S. 465, 467 , 119 S. Ct. 2013, 2013 (1999) (explaining that “If a car is readily mobile and probable cause exists to believe it contains contraband, the Fourth Amendment . . . permits police to search the whole vehicle without more” and rejecting the proposition that exigent circumstances are necessary to trigger the “automobile exception” to the warrant requirement); Amos v. State , 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex. Crim.
holding that “[o]nce probable cause to believe that the car contained evidence of a crime was established, the officers could conduct a valid search of the car immediately, without a warrant”
green
Dean Hohnstein v. State (2007)
Amos v. State , 819 S.W.2d 156, 163 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991), cert. denied , 504 U.S. 917 , 112 S.Ct. 1959 , 118 L.Ed.2d 561 (1992).
green
Raymond Cazares v. State (2006)
Amos v. State , 819 S.W.2d 156, 159 (Tex. Crim.
green
Luvano v. State (2006)
Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 159 (Tex.Crim.App.1991).
green
Shad Edward Luvano v. State (2006)
Amos v. State , 819 S.W.2d 156, 159 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).
green
Duncan v. State (2005)
The "automobile exception” authorizes an officer to conduct a warrantless search of an automobile as long as the officer reasonably believes (1) there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, (2) there is contraband located in the vehicle, and (3) “it is not practicable to secure a warrant because the vehicle can be quickly moved out of the locality or jurisdiction in which the warrant must be sought.” Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 48-49 , 90 S.Ct. 1…
green
State v. Garrett (2005)
Accord Adkins v. State, 717 S.W.2d 363, 365-66 (Tex.Crim.App.1986) (considering automobile warrant exception); Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 160 (Tex.Crim.App.1991) (same); Zarychta v. State, 44 S.W.3d 155 , 168 n. 6 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. ref'd) (discussing probable-cause warrant exception); see 40 Dix & Dawson, Texas Practice: Crim.
green
Cisneros v. State (2005)
An officer may search a vehicle without a warrant (1) if there is probable cause 4 to *858 believe that a crime has been committed, (2) if there is probable cause to believe that contraband is located in the vehicle, and (3) “where it is not practicable to secure a warrant because the vehicle can be quickly moved out of the locality or jurisdiction in which the warrant must be sought.” Blaylock v. State, 125 S.W.3d 702, 705 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2003, pet. ref'd) (quoting Cham…
green
Douglas Wayne Matthews v. State (2005)
Chambers v. Maroney , 399 U.S. 42, 48-49 , 90 S. Ct. 1975, 1979-80 (1970); Amos v. State , 819 S.W.2d 156, 160-61 (Tex. Crim.
green
Douglas Wayne Matthews v. State (2005)
App. 1984); see also United States v. Watkins , 179 F.3d 489, 494-95, 499 (6th Cir. 1999). 34: United States v. Robinson , 414 U.S. 218, 243 , 94 S. Ct. 467, 480 (1973); Russell , 717 S.W.2d at 9-10 . 35: Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 48-49 , 90 S. Ct. 1975, 1979-80 (1970); Amos v. State , 819 S.W.2d 156, 160-61 (Tex. Crim.
green
David Daniel Lauer v. State (2004)
App. 1994) (citing Amos v. State , 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex. Crim.
green
David Daniel Lauer v. State (2004)
App. 1994) (citing Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex. Crim.
green
Blaylock v. State (2003)
Applicable in this case is the automobile exception, which permits officers to conduct a war-rantless search of an automobile as long as there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed and that there is contraband located in the vehicle and “where it is not practicable to secure a warrant because the vehicle can be quickly moved out of the locality or jurisdiction in which the warrant must be sought.” Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 48-49 , 90 S.Ct. 1975…
green
Hampton v. State (2002)
See Bagley, 473 U.S. at 682 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 ; United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 112-13 , 96 S.Ct. 2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 159-60 (Tex.Crim.App.1991); Turpin v. State, 606 S.W.2d 907, 916 (Tex.Crim.App.1980). 25 .
green
Charles Donald Clark v. State (1998)
Amos v. State , 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); State v. Guzman , 959 S.W.2d 631, 633 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).
green
Carman, Patricia v. State (1996)
Amos v. State , 819 S.W.2d 156, 163 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991), cert. denied , 504 U.S. 917 , 112 S.Ct. 1959 , 118 L.Ed.2d 561 (1992).
green
Carman, Patricia v. State (1996)
Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 163 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 917 , 112 S.Ct. 1959 , 118 L.Ed.2d 561 (1992).
green
Johnny L. Reed v. State (1996)
Amos v. State , 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The "totality of the circumstances" test is used to determine whether probable cause existed for a warrantless search.
green
Cornejo v. State (1996)
See Powell v. State, 898 S.W.2d 821, 827 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 524 , 133 L.Ed.2d 431 (1995); Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 917 , 112 S.Ct. 1959 , 118 L.Ed.2d 561 (1992).
green
Bustamante v. State (1996)
Whether the officer possessed probable cause to pursue a course of action is determined by the “totality of the circumstances.” Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 230-31 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2328 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 917 , 112 S.Ct. 1959 , 118 L.Ed.2d 561 (1992).
green
in the Matter of D. A. S. (1995)
Amos v. State , 819 S.W.2d 156, 163 (Tex. Crim.
green
Reyes v. State (1995)
Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex. Crim.App.1991).
green
Perkins v. State (1995)
Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 163 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 917 , 112 S.Ct. 1959 , 118 L.Ed.2d 561 (1992); McIntosh, 855 S.W.2d at 767 .
green
Boudreaux v. State (1994)
Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 159-160 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1959 , 118 L.Ed.2d 561 (1992).
green
Sanford Hood v. State (1994)
Amos v. State , 819 S.W.2d 156, 163 (Tex. Crim.
green
Jones v. State (1993)
Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 159-60 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1959 , 118 L.Ed.2d 561 (1992).
green
McIntosh v. State (1993)
Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 163 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1959 , 118 L.Ed.2d 561 (1992).
green
Cruz v. State (1993)
Bagley, 473 U.S. at 692 , 105 S.Ct. at 3388 ; Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 159 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1959 , 118 L.Ed.2d 561 (1992).
green
Jason Eugene Deleon v. State (2017)
See Amos v. State, 819 S.W.2d 156, 161 (Tex. Crim.
green
Darin Keith Martin v. State (2008)
Under the automobile exception, officers may conduct a warrantless search of an automobile readily capable of being used on a public highway as long as 1) there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, 2) there is probable cause to believe contraband is located in the vehicle, and 3) "where it is not practicable to secure a warrant because the vehicle can be quickly moved out of the locality or jurisdiction in which the warrant must be sought." Chambers …