McDonald v. State (1969)
green
· 72 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 27 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196919972026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Gutierrez, Maricela Rodriguez (2012)
See also McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex. Crim.
“This Court has consistently held that where the trial court grants probation, the relationship between the court and the probationer is contractual in nature[.]”
green
Rickels v. State (2003)
Art. 42.12, § 11(a) (Vernon 2001). [7] McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex.Crim.App.1969). [8] Id. [9] Carroll J.
green
David Earl Pierce v. State of Texas (2001)
Laws 317 , 491); McDonald v. State , 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969) (same) The current statute reads in a similar fashion.
same
green
Cortez v. State (1998)
Ann. art. 42.12, § 11(a) (Vernon Supp.1998)); Me- Donald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex.Crim.App.1969). .
green
Jeffrey Mark Roberts v. State (1994)
Laws 317 , 491); McDonald v. State , 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969) (same) The current statute reads in a similar fashion.
same
green
State v. Moses (1992)
Ct. App. 1991) (“trial court reversibly errs when it delegates judicial responsibility to a probation officer”); McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex. Crim.
condition that probationer “remain within the confines specified by the Probation Officer” invalid because it enabled the officer to determine a condition of probation and alter it from time to time at his discretion without the approval of the court
green
Gutierrez, Maricela Rodriguez (2012)
See also McDonald v. State , 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex. Crim.
"This Court has consistently held that where the trial court grants probation, the relationship between the court and the probationer is contractual in nature[.]"
green
Maricela Rodriguez Gutierrez v. State (2011)
McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex. Crim.
green
Maricela Rodriguez Gutierrez v. State (2011)
McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex.Crim.App.1969). 6 .
green
Brandon Lee Anderson v. State (2010)
McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).
green
in Re Van Lee Brewer (2009)
McDonald v. State , 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).
green
Benito Santos Aguilar v. State (2008)
McDonald v. State , 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex. Crim.
green
Jesus Guzman v. State (2005)
McDonald v. State , 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); see also DeGay v. State , 741 S.W.2d 445, 449 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987) (en banc).
green
Pierce v. State (2001)
Laws 317 , 491); McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex.Crim.App.1969) (same) The current statute reads in a similar fashion.
green
State v. Williams (1999)
See also State v. Nelson, 417 N.W.2d 814, 818 (N.D. 1987); McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex. Crim.
green
Linda Mae Lilly v. State (1998)
App. 1969); McDonald v. State , 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex. Crim.
green
Ortega v. State (1993)
DeGay, 741 S.W.2d at 449; McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex.Crim.App.1969); Johnson v. State, 672 S.W.2d 621, 623 (Tex.App.— Corpus Christi 1984, no pet.).
green
Pichon v. State (1988)
Flores v. State, 513 S.W.2d 66, 69 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex.Crim.App.1969).
green
Lassiter v. State (1986)
See Parsons v. State, 513 S.W.2d 554, 555 (Tex. Cr.App.1974); McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex.Cr.App.1969). .
green
Hardman v. State (1981)
See McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); DeLeon v. State, 466 S.W.2d 573 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Kuenstler v. State, 486 S.W.2d 367 (Tex.Cr.
green
Diannia Shirlene Overstreet v. State (2013)
See McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386, 387 (Tex. Crim.
green
Smith v. State (1975)
See also Cox v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 445 S.W.2d 200 ; McDonald v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 442 S.W.2d 386 .
green
Johnson v. State (1973)
See McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386 (Tex. Cr.App.1969). 2 . 18 U.S.C.A., § 7 , in part, provides: “The term ‘special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States’, as used in this title, includes : “3.
green
Kuenstler v. State (1972)
See McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386 (Tex.Cr.App.1969). 2 .
green
Kelly v. State (1972)
Accord, e. g., McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386 (Tex.Cr.App.1969) ; Stover v. State, 365 S.W.2d 808 (Tex.Cr.App.1963) ; Glenn v. State, 168 Tex.Cr.R. 312 , 327 S.W.2d 763 (1959) ; McBee v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 562 , 316 S.W.2d 748 (1958).
green
Whitney v. State (1971)
See, McDonald v. State, 442 S.W.2d 386 (Tex.Cr.App.1969).
green
Cox v. State (1969)
See McDonald v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 442 S.W.2d 386 , and the cases therein cited. .