How cited: Hunt v. City Stores, Inc. · Go Syfert

Hunt v. City Stores, Inc. (1980)

green · 228 citation events across 8 courts. Showing the 44 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 44
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198020032026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Mrs. Emma Jean Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation (1984)
Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
For example, in Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 589 (La.1980), the court stated: 13 [T]he plaintiff in a products liability suit must only prove that the product was defective, i.e., unreasonably dangerous to normal use; that the product was in normal use at the time the injury occurred; that the product's defect might cause his injury; and that the injury might reasonably have been anticipated by the manufacturer.
green prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,408 Celina Lynette Goode and Thomas Eugene Goode, Cross-Appellants v. Herman Miller, … (1987)
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 589 (La.1980).
green Otis Scott v. White Trucks, and Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Intervenor-Appellant (1983)
Quote Authority · 5th Cir.
Hunt, 387 So.2d at 589 (“Here, the risk of harm was known to Otis but not obvious to the public....
“Here, the risk of harm was known to Otis but not obvious to the public.... Despite knowledge of the danger presented to children in tennis shoes, Otis had not warned of that hazard.”
green Hebert v. ANCO Insulation, Inc. (2002)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Brown v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, 514 So.2d 439, 444 (La.1987); Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 590 (La.1980); see also Francis v. American Well Service and Drilling, Inc., 617 So.2d 1329, 1332 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1993).
green Breeden v. Valencia, Inc. (1990)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
In determining reasonableness, *308 the court is to balance the probability and magnitude of the risk against the utility of the thing, Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 588 (La. 1980), and must consider the case in terms of moral, social and economic considerations, Entrevia v. Hood, 427 So.2d at 1149 ; Tracy v. Jefferson Parish, 523 So.2d at 271 .
green Marshall v. Jazz Casino Co. (2016)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
See generally Brown v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 514 So.2d 439, 445 (La.1987) (Escalators are “not unreasonably dangerous ‘per se’” _); Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 587 (La.1980) (in negligence action, no evidence that child injured on escalator was “misbehaving or that he deliberately wedged his foot in the machine.”).
green Jimenez v. OMNI ROYAL ORLEANS HOTEL (2011)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
See Smolinski v. Taulli, 276 So.2d 286, 288 (La.1973); Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 588 (La.1980); Oster v. Dep’t of Transp.
green Burns v. CLK Investments V, L.L.C. (2010)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
In determining whether a risk is reasonable or unreasonable, the factfinder’s task is to balance the probability and magnitude of the risk against the utility of the thing, Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 588 (La.1980).
green Cutrer v. Gulf States Utilities Co. (1996)
Rule Authority · M.D. La.
See Ducre, 752 F.2d at 984-86 ; Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 590 (La. 1980). .
green Bernard v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (1994)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 588 (La.1980); Carter v. Board of Supervisors Of Louisiana State University, 459 So.2d 1263, 1266 (La.App. 1st Cir.1984), writ denied 462 So.2d 1248 (La.1985); see also Entrevia v. Hood, 427 So.2d 1146, 1148 (La|41983).
green Brinson v. Morgan City Housing Authority (1993)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
See Entrevia v. Hood, 427 So.2d 1146 (La.1983); Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Company, 418 So.2d at 497 ; Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 588 (La.1980).
green Smith v. State Through Dept. of Public Safety (1992)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 589 (La.1980) (construing a service contract provision with language identical to that in this case, we found the store owner was the sole custodian of the escalator); see also Brown [v. Otis Elevator Co.], supra, 535 So.2d [525] at 527 [(La.App. 4th Cir.1988)].
green Spott v. Otis Elevator Co. (1992)
Rule Authority · La.
Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 589 (La.1980) (construing a service contract provision with language identical to that in this case, we found the store owner was the sole custodian of the escalator); see also Brown, supra, 535 So.2d at 527 .
green Oster v. Dept. of Transp. & Development (1991)
Rule Authority · La.
Because we hold the drainage ditch did not present an unreasonable risk of harm under the facts of this case, whether DOTD was aware of the condition of the land in its custody is immaterial. [5] See Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 588 (La.1980). [6] By pointing out that Gernard Casbon was riding a dirt bike in an area not intended to be used as an area for off-road vehicular use, we do not intend to imply that dangerous conditions on property may never be consider…
green Oster v. Department of Transportation & Development, State of Louisiana (1990)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
Jones v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 430 So.2d 1134 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983), citing Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 588 (La. 1980).
green McCoy v. Otis Elevator Co., Inc. (1989)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
Bloxom v. Bloxom, 512 So.2d 839 (La. 1987); Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, 484 So.2d 110 (La.1986); Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585 *231 (La.1980).
green Surgi v. Otis Elevator Co. (1989)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
Products Liability Claim Against Otis The court in Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 589 (La.1980) set out the standard of proof in a product liability claim, as follows: ...[U]nder Weber [ Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of N.Y., 250 So.2d 754 (La.1971)], the plaintiff in a products liability suit must only prove that the product was defective, i.e., unreasonably dangerous to normal use; that the product was in normal use at the time the injury occurred; …
green Silliker v. St. Landry Police Jury (1987)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 588 (La. 1980).
green Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Co-Op., Inc. (1986)
Rule Authority · La.
Loescher v. Parr, 324 So.2d 441, 444 (La.1975) found liable the owner of a tree that fell because it "constituted an unreasonable hazard of injury to those upon whom it might foreseeably fall." The "likelihood and gravity of harm" of the escalator in Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 589 (La.1980), rendered the escalator unreasonably dangerous to children wearing soft rubber soled shoes.
green Bradford v. CONSOLIDATED AMERICAN INS. CO. (1986)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 588 (La.1980).
green Quattlebaum v. Hy-Reach Equipment Inc. (1984)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
In Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 589 (La.1980), the court followed the Weber rule and characterized it as "a rule of strict liability for manufacturers of defective products".
green Landry v. Bill Garrett Chevrolet, Inc. (1983)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
Subsequent to Spillars , our Supreme Court in Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585 (La.1980), reaffirmed a requirement of forseeability on the part of the manufacturer, by stating: "Thus, under Weber , the plaintiff in a products liability suit must only prove that the product was defective, i.e., unreasonably dangerous to normal use; that the product was in normal use at the time the injury occurred; that the product's defect caused his injury; and that the injury might…
green Farr v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc. (1983)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 588 (La. 1980).
green Alexander v. Rapides Parish Police Jury (1982)
Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.
In both negligence and strict liability cases, the probability and magnitude of the risk are to be balanced against the utility of the thing. ...” Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 588 (La.1980).
green Hulin v. Fibreboard Corp. (1999)
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585 (La.1980) (applying risk/utility test for design defect products liability and strict liability under Civil Code Article 2317); Winterrowd v. Travelers Indem.
green Hulin v. Fibreboard Corp. (1999)
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585 (La.1980) (applying risk/utility test for design defect products liability and strict liability under Civil Code Article 2317); Winterrowd v. Travelers Indem.
green Joseph Perkins v. F.I.E. Corporation, Judie Richman, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estat… (1985)
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 589 (La.1980). 11 3.
green Perkins v. F.I.E. Corp. (1985)
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 589 (La.1980). 3.
green Joseph Perkins v. F.I.E. Corporation, Judie Richman, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estat… (1984)
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 589 (La.1980). 23 3.
green Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd. (1995)
Cited (see also) · La. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 590 (La.1980) ("In the absence of some greater fault being shown on the part of either, the obligation is solidary").
green Burton v. Housing Authority of New Orleans, Inc. (1993)
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: accord
Accord Hunt v. City Stores, 387 So.2d 585, 588 (La.1980).
green Simeon v. Doe (1993)
Cited · La. · signal: see
See Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585 (La.1980), and Halphen .
green Hughes v. Green (1992)
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585, 588 (La.1980).
green Rodrigue v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. (1989)
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Hunt v. City Stores, 387 So.2d 585 (La.1980).
green Dalton v. Breaux (1987)
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585 (La.1980).
green Marshall v. Beno Truck Equipment, Inc. (1986)
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585 (La.1980).
green Gaudet v. G.D.C., Inc. (1985)
Cited (see also) · La. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585 (La.1980).
green C & v. GRAVEL, INC. v. MacO Const. Corp. (1985)
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585 (La.1980).
green Smith v. Formica Corp. (1983)
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585 (La.1980); Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck, Inc., 358 So.2d 926 (La.1978); Andries v. General Motors Corp., Delco Batteries, 417 So.2d 479 (La.
green Richman v. Charter Arms Corp. (1983)
Cited (see also) · E.D. La. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., *195 387 So.2d 585 (La.1980); Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corp., supra. Here they clearly are.
green Dutschke v. Piper Aircraft Corp. (1983)
Cited (see also) · M.D. La. · signal: see also
Co. of N.Y., 259 La. 599 , 250 So.2d 754 (1971); see also Brown v. Link Belt Division of FMC Corp., 666 F.2d 110 (5th Cir.1982), citing Hill v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585 (La.1980).
green Rollins v. Ford Motor Co. (1982)
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585 (La.1980); Sepulvado v. State, Through Dept. of Hwys., 395 So.2d 858 (La.App. 2d Cir.1981); Kirsch v. Kappa Alpha Order, 373 So.2d 775 (La.App. 3d Cir.1979).
green Smith v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. (1981)
Cited (see also) · La. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., 387 So.2d 585 (La.1980).
green Stablier v. City of Baton Rouge (1981)
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see
See their dissent in Hunt v. City Stores, Inc., La., 387 So.2d 585 (1980).