Fhagen v. Miller (1969)
green
· 19 citation events
across 8 courts.
Showing the 7 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Lynch v. Baxley (1974)
In re Barnard, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 302 , 455 F.2d 1370, 1374 (1971); Lessard v. Schmidt, 349 F.Supp. 1078, 1090-1091 (E.D.Wis.1972), vacated and remanded 414 U.S. 473 , 94 S.Ct. 713 , 38 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); Fhagen v. Miller, 306 F. Supp. 634, 638 (S.D.N.Y.1969).
green
Logan v. Arafeh (1972)
Fhagen v. Miller, 306 F.Supp. 634, 638 (S.D.N.Y.1969); Fhagen v. Miller, supra,, 328 N.Y.S.2d at 396 , 278 N.E.2d at 617 ; In re Coates, 9 N.Y.2d 242, 249 , 213 N.Y.S.2d 74, 79 , 173 N.E.2d 797, 801 (1961); see also, Anderson v. Solomon, 315 F.Supp. 1192, 1194 (D.
green
Gomez v. Miller (1971)
Furthermore, as stated in Fhagen v. Miller, 306 F.Supp. 634, 638 (1969): “It is true that habeas corpus is always available to test the lawfulness of detention.
(I intimate no views as to damages, as to which no proof has been offered on this motion.) Imminence of harm or, put another way, irreparability of damage to the plaintiff is demonstrated by Lollis’ continuance in custody and the views, articulated on this motion by Superintendent Shaughnessy (the sole defendant to submit any statement, much less affidavit) that treatment of Lollis was correct, cf. Fhagen v. Miller, 306 F.Supp. 634, 636-637 (S.D.N.Y. 1969), (Weinfeld, J.).
green
Fhagen v. Miller (1970)
The Federal court opined that, because of plaintiff Fhagen’s experience (i.e., adjournment of the habeas corpus hearing over the objection of his counsel), this may be an £i illusory remedy ” (see Fhagen v. Miller, supra, p. 637, n. 5 ).
green
Gesicki v. Oswald (1971)
See Fhagen v. Miller, 306 F.Supp. 634 (S.D.N.Y.1969); Lollis v. New York State Department of Social Services et al., 322 F.Supp. 473 (S.D.N.Y.1970). 3 .
green
Dale v. Hahn (1970)
Compare Fhagen v. Miller, 306 F.Supp. 634, 636-637 (S.D.N.Y.1969).