How cited: Hobgood v. Koch Pipeline Southeast, Inc. · Go Syfert

Hobgood v. Koch Pipeline Southeast, Inc. (2000)

green · 42 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 16 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 16
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200020132026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Andrew Failla and Anthony Failla v. David P. Failla and Cindy R. Failla (2026)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
Hobgood v. Koch Pipeline SE Inc., 769 So. 2d 838, 840 (¶3) (Miss.
green Debbie Jones v. Dragway Enterprises, Inc. (2016)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Inc., 769 So.2d 838, 845 (¶ 35) (Miss.
quoting M.R.C.P. 56(f)
green Sean McDowell v. Zion Baptist Church (2016)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Inc., 769 So.2d 838, 843 (¶¶24-25) (Miss.
internal citations and quotation marks omitted
green Hosey v. Mediamolle (2007)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Hobgood v. Koch Pipeline Southeast, Inc., 769 So.2d 838, 845 (¶ 35) (Miss.Ct.App.2000).
green Partin v. North Mississippi Medical Center (2005)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Hobgood, 769 So.2d at 845 (¶ 35). ¶ 59.
¶ 35
green John William Mayton v. Jane Oliver (2017)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App.
Inc., 769 So. 2d 838, 843 (¶24) (Miss.
green Davis v. Hindman (2014)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App.
Further, this Court has stated that “[a]s part of that exercise of discretion, the trial judge must have proof of diligence by the party seeking delay.” Hobgood v. Koch Pipeline Se., Inc., 769 So.2d 838, 846 (¶ 38) (Miss.Ct.App.2000).
green Hackler v. PHC-Cleveland, Inc. (2012)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App.
Hobgood, v. Koch Pipeline Se., Inc., 769 So.2d 838, 846 (¶ 38) (Miss.Ct.App.2000).
green Lee v. South Mississippi Electric Power Ass'n (2009)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App.
Hobgood v. Koch Pipeline Southeast, Inc., 769 So.2d 838, 843 (¶ 24) (Miss.Ct.App.2000).
green Robinson v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Co. (2005)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App.
Hobgood v. Koch Pipeline Southeast, Inc., 769 So.2d 838, 845 (¶ 35) (Miss.Ct.App.2000). ¶ 11.
green Crawford v. Butler (2005)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App.
Hobgood v. Koch Pipeline Southeast, Inc., 769 So.2d 838, 843 (¶ 24) (Miss.Ct.App.2000).
green Cives Steel Co. Port of Rosedale v. Williams (2004)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App.
M.R.A.P. 5(a); Hobgood v. Koch Pipeline Southeast, Inc., 769 So.2d 838, 841 (Miss.Ct.App.2000).
green Wingerter v. Brotherhood Productions, Inc. (2002)
Rule Authority · Miss. Ct. App.
The Rule 56(f) exception is not to be used in place of active diligence during the discovery process. "[N]ormally the party invoking Rule 56(f) must show what steps have been taken to obtain access to the information allegedly within the exclusive possession of the other party." Hobgood v. Koch Pipeline Southeast, Inc., 769 So.2d 838, 845 (¶ 35) (Miss.Ct.App. 2000), quoting Marx v. Truck Renting and Leasing Assoc., Inc., 520 So.2d 1333, 1344 (Miss.1987).
green Byrd v. Mississippi Power Co. (2006)
Cited · Miss. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Hobgood v. Koch Pipeline Southeast, Inc., 769 So.2d 838, 841 (¶ 10) (Miss.Ct.App.2000) (holding that "[a]bsent permission requested and granted for an interlocutory appeal, an appellant may only seek review of a final judgment.
green Mid Valley Pipeline Company, LLC v. Rodgers (2023)
Cited · N.D. Miss. · signal: see
See Hobgood v. Koch Pipeline Se., Inc., 769 So. 2d 838, 843 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000).
green Millsaps v. Stout (2003)
Cited · Miss. Ct. App. · signal: see
M.R.A.P. 2(c); see Hobgood v. Koch Pipeline Southeast, Inc., 769 So.2d 838, 841 (¶ 13) (Miss.Ct.App. 2000).