Towne v. Towne (1988)
green
· 56 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 17 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198820072026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Harris v. Harris (1998)
Towne v. Towne, 150 Vt. 286, 288 , 552 A.2d 404, 405 (1988).
green
Adamson v. Dodge (2002)
Child support obligations may be modified as of “any reasonable date on or after the date of filing of the motion to amend the support order, within the sound discretion of the trial court.” Towne v. Towne, 150 Vt. 286, 288 , 552 A.2d 404, 405 (1988).
green
Pahnke/Office of Child Support v. Pahnke (2014)
Towne v. Towne , 150 Vt. 286, 288 , 552 A.2d 404, 405-06 (1988).
green
Pahnke v. Pahnke (2014)
Towne v. Towne, 150 Vt. 286, 288 , 552 A.2d 404, 405-06 (1988).
green
Sundstrom v. Sundstrom (2004)
A child support order may be modified only as to installments that accrued after a motion to modify has been filed. 15 V.S.A. § 660(e); Towne v. Towne, 150 Vt. 286, 288 , 552 A.2d 404, 406 (1988).
green
Cd v. Nm (1993)
As previously discussed, the court has the discretion to make its ruling retroactive to "any reasonable date on or after the date of filing of the motion to amend the support order." Towne v. Towne, 150 Vt. 286, 288 , 552 A.2d 404, 405 (1988).
green
C.D. v. N.M. (1993)
As previously discussed, the court has the discretion to make its ruling retroactive to “any reasonable date on or after the date of filing of the motion to amend the support order.” Towne v. Towne, 150 Vt. 286, 288 , 552 A.2d 404, 405 (1988).
green
Olson v. Garbe (1992)
Such a result would defeat the purpose of the changed circumstances rule.” Towne v. Towne, [ 150 Vt. 286 ] 552 A.2d 404, 405 (Vt.1988) quoting Trezevant v. Trezevant, 403 A.2d 1134, 1137 (D.C.1979).
green
Chaker v. Chaker (1990)
In Towne v. Towne, 150 Vt. 286, 288-89 , 552 A.2d 404, 406 (1988), we held that an order modifying a child support award could be effective as early as the date on which the motion to amend was filed.
green
Klein v. Klein (1990)
Towne v. Towne, 150 Vt. 286, 287-88 , 552 A.2d 404, 405-06 (1988).
green
Viskup v. Viskup (1988)
Towne v. Towne, 150 Vt. 286, 288 , 552 A.2d 404, 406 (1988); see also Trezevant v. Trezevant, 403 A.2d 1134, 1138 (D.C. 1979) (allowing retroactive modification of child support orders to any date back to and including date of filing of motion for modification).
allowing retroactive modification of child support orders to any date back to and including date of filing of motion for modification
green
Ainsworth v. Ainsworth (1990)
See Towne v. Towne, 150 Vt. 286, 289 , 552 A.2d 404, 406 (1988).
green
Hausermann v. Hausermann (2013)
See Towne v. Towne, 150 Vt. 286, 288 , 552 A.2d 404, 406 (1988) (discussing retroactive application of child support modification); see also Chaker v. Chaker, 155 Vt. 20, 30 , 581 A.2d 737, 742-43 (1990) (applying Towne to determine effective date for maintenance award).
discussing retroactive application of child support modification
green
Lawrence v. Lawrence (1991)
See, e.g., Towne v. Towne, 150 Vt. 286 , 552 A.2d 404 (1988) (retroactive modification may be allowed as of any reasonable date on or after the date of the filing of the motion to amend the support order, within the sound discretion of the trial court).
retroactive modification may be allowed as of any reasonable date on or after the date of the filing of the motion to amend the support order, within the sound discretion of the trial court
green
Isham v. Isham (1989)
See Towne v. Towne, 150 Vt. 286, 288 , 552 A.2d 404, 406 (1988).
green
McCormick v. McCormick (1988)
See Towne v. Towne, 150 Vt. 286, 288 , 552 A.2d 404, 406 (1988); DeKoeyer v. DeKoeyer, 146 Vt. 493, 495 , 507 A.2d 962, 963-64 (1986) (“The circumstances of the parties prior to the divorce and any interim changes that were not in existence at the hearing were irrelevant.”).
green
Stacy Hoechner v. Ernest Hoechner (2013)
See Towne v. Towne, 150 Vt. 286, 289 (1988) (“An abuse of discretion will be found only if the trial court fails to exercise its discretion, or exercises it for clearly untenable reasons or to an untenable extent.” (quotation omitted)). 4 some of the equipment dated to the mid-1990s, and he bought some as recently as 2011.
“An abuse of discretion will be found only if the trial court fails to exercise its discretion, or exercises it for clearly untenable reasons or to an untenable extent.” (quotation omitted)