Whittington v. Whittington (2007)
green
· 41 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200820172026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
K.B. v. D.B. (2020)
Cyr, 228 Md. App. 163, 184 (2016) (quoting Whittington v. Whittington, 172 Md. App. 317, 335-36 (2007)).
green
St. Cyr v. St. Cyr (2016)
In Maryland, the principal function of alimony is “rehabilitation of the economically dependent spouse.” Whittington v. Whittington, 172 Md.
citing Karmand, 145 Md. App. at 327
green
Kaplan v. Kaplan (2020)
A finding of unconscionable disparity is a “second-level fact, however, that necessarily rests upon the court’s first-level factual findings on the factors, listed in FL section 11-106(b).” Whittington v. Whittington, 172 Md. App. 317, 337 (2007).
green
Lee v. Andochick (2008)
See Whittington v. Whittington, 172 Md.App. 317, 339-40 , 914 A.2d 212 (2007) (vacating and remanding award of indefinite alimony where trial court considered only length of marriage and disparity in incomes); Brewer v. Brewer, 156 Md.App. 77, 105 , 846 A.2d 1 (2004) (vacating and remanding judgment where trial court only considered disparity in assets and not disparity in standard of living). 4 For the reasons stated above we shall reverse the trial court’s award of indefin…
vacating and remanding award of indefinite alimony where trial court considered only length of marriage and disparity in incomes
green
Walter v. Walter (2008)
See also Whittington, supra, 172 Md.App. at 336 , 914 A.2d 212 .