Senterfitt v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. (2005)
green
· 13 citation events
across 7 courts.
Showing the 4 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Admiral Insurance v. Abshire (2009)
Neither is this case analogous to Senterfitt v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., 385 F.Supp.2d 1377, 1378-79 (S.D.Ga.2005), which involved an amendment adding an additional 16 years to the class period and "significantly increas[ing] the size of the potential class.” 17 . 388 F.Supp.2d at 1313 . 18 .
green
Charlot v. Ecolab, Inc. (2015)
Reply at 3.) This court respectfully denies the Named Plaintiffs’ objection and adopts the R & R’s well-reasoned analysis of fair notice, based on the rationale in American Pipe, which found that fair notice should alert a defendant to “not only the substantive claims being brought against [defendant], but also of the number and generic identities of the potential plaintiffs who may participate in the judgment.” American Pipe, 414 U.S. at 554-55 , 94 S.Ct. 756 (1974); see al…
green
GRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Peters (2008)
Aug. 8, 2007); Senterfitt v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., 385 F.Supp.2d 1377, 1380 (S.D.Ga.2005).
green
Wright v. American Bankers Life Assurance Co. (2008)
See also Senterfitt, 385 F.Supp.2d at 1380 (“For an amendment to relate back to the date of the original complaint, the original complaint must have provided adequate notice to the defendant ‘not only of the substantive claims being brought against [it], but also of the number and generic identities of the potential plaintiffs who may participate in the judgment.’ ”) (quoting Cliff v. Payco Gen.