George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc., D/B/A Whitten Corporation v. State University Construction Fund (1974)
green
· 88 citation events
across 28 courts.
Showing the 24 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197420002026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
But see In re San Juan, supra, 888 F.2d at 943 (state agency that received more than 70 percent of a recent annual budget from general funds of Puerto Rico and whose policies are under significant control by the governor’s office found to be so financially and politically dependent upon the Commonwealth as to be an arm of it); Whitten, supra, at 181 (university construction fund, with “no financial independence of its own”, was held to be an alter ego of the state); Perez v.…
university construction fund, with “no financial independence of its own”, was held to be an alter ego of the state
Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 180 (1st Cir.1974); cf. Metcalf & Eddy, 991 F.2d at 940 ("[T]he more tightly the agency and the state are entangled, the more probable it becomes that the agency shares the state's Eleventh Amendment immunity."). 8 1.
green
Jackson Sawmill Co. v. United States (1978)
Whitten v. State University Const. Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 180 (1st Cir. 1974) (Moore, J.); Gordenstein v. University of Delaware, 381 F.Supp. 718, 721 (D.Del.1974); Bowen v. Hackett, supra; Krisel v. Duran, supra, 258 F.Supp. at 849 ; see Edelman v. Jordan, supra, 415 U.S. at 663, 94 S.Ct. 1347 .
Moore, J.
green
Jackson Sawmill Company, Inc. v. United States (1978)
Whitten v. State University Const. Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 180 (1st Cir. 1974) (Moore, J.); Gordenstein v. University of Delaware, 381 F.Supp. 718, 721 (D.Del.1974); Bowen v. Hackett, supra; Krisel v. Duran, supra, 258 F.Supp. at 849 ; see Edelman v. Jordan, supra, 415 U.S. at 663, 94 S.Ct. 1347 .
Moore, J.
green
10 Fair empl.prac.cas. 956, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,270 Garland M. Fitzpatrick, Donald Matthews and Mortimer… (1975)
Whitten v. State University Const. Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 180 (1st Cir. 1974) (Moore, J. ); Gordenstein v. University of Delaware, 381 F.Supp. 718, 721 (D.Del.1974); Bowen v. Hackett, supra ; Krisel v. Duran, supra, 258 F.Supp. at 849 ; see Edelman v. Jordan,supra, 415 U.S. at 663 , 94 S.Ct. 1347 .
Moore, J.
green
Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer (1975)
Whitten v. State University Const. Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 180 (1st Cir. 1974) (Moore, J.); Gordenstein v. University of Delaware, 381 F.Supp. 718, 721 (D.Del.1974); Bowen v. Hackett, su pra; Krisel v. Duran, supra, 258 F.Supp. at 849 ; see Edelman v. Jordan, supra, 415 U.S. at 663 , 94 S.Ct. 1347 .
Moore, J.
green
University v. A.W. Chesterton (1993)
Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 180 (1st Cir. 1974); cf. Metcalf & Eddy, F.2d at [No. 91- 1602, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10064, at 12 (1st Cir. May 3, 1993)] ("[T]he more tightly the agency and the state are entangled, the more probable it becomes that the agency shares the state's Eleventh Amendment immunity.").8 8URI argues that Rhode Island case law provides a definitive statement on the functional interdependence of the Board and the State.
green
Ronwin v. Shapiro (1981)
Whitten, Jr. Inc. v. State University Construction Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 179-182 (1st Cir. 1974); Annot., 6 A.L.R.Fed. 615 (1971); Note, A Practical View of the Eleventh Amendment Lower Court Interpretations and the Supreme Court's Reaction, 61 Georgetown L.J. 1473, 1485-87 (1973) 2 See e. g., Korgich v. Regents of New Mexico School of Mines, 582 F.2d 549, 551 (10th Cir. 1978); Brennan v. University of Kansas, 451 F.2d 1287, 1290 (10th Cir. 1971).
green
Ronwin v. Shapiro (1981)
Whitten, Jr. Inc. v. State University Construction Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 179-182 (1st Cir. 1974); Annot., 6 A.L.R.Fed. 615 (1971); Note, A Practical View of the Eleventh Amendment— Lower Court Interpretations and the Supreme Court’s Reaction, 61 Georgetown L.J. 1473, 1485-87 (1973). .
Whitten, Jr., *932 Inc. v. State University Construction Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 179-80 (1st Cir. 1974).... ‘Only where an agency functions without meaningful fiscal and operational autonomy from the state can it partake of the state’s Eleventh Amendment immunity.’ Vanlaarhoven, 564 F.Supp. at 148 (citations omitted). 2 Judge Selya did not ignore the proposition that state law controls the sovereign immunity issue.
green
University of Rhode Island v. A.W. Chesterton Co. (1989)
Whitten, Jr., Inc. v. State University Construction Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 179-80 (1st Cir.1974).
green
Strauss v. Rolewick (1989)
Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 179-80 (1st Cir.1974); Pennsylvania Human Relations Comm’n v. USAir, Inc., 615 F.Supp. 75, 77 (W.D.Pa.1985) (citing Urbano v. Board of Mgmt. of N.J.
green
State of Me. v. Data General Corp. (1988)
Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 179-80 (1st Cir.1974); Moor v. County of Alameda, supra 411 U.S. at 719-20 , 93 S.Ct. at 1800-01 (financial independence, corporate powers, and proprietary powers indicate county is not arm of state).
green
Vanlaarhoven v. Newman (1983)
Whitten, Jr., Inc. v. State University Construction Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 179-80 (1st Cir.1974).
green
RI Affiliate Am. Civ. Liberties v. RI LOTTERY (1982)
Whitten, Jr., Inc. v. State University Construction Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 179-80 (1st Cir.1974).
green
Rhode Island Affiliate, American Civil Liberties Union, Inc. v. Rhode Island Lottery Commission (1982)
Whitten, Jr., Inc. v. State University Construction Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 179-80 (1st Cir.1974).
green
Holley Ex Rel. McQuoid v. Lavine (1979)
Whitten, Jr., Inc. v. State University Construction Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 179-80 (1st Cir. 1974); Urbano v. Board of Managers, 415 F.2d 247, 250-51 (3d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 948 , 90 S.Ct. 967 , 25 L.Ed.2d 128 (1970); Krisel v. Duran, 258 F.Supp. 845, 849 (S.D.N.Y.1966), aff’d per curiam, 386 F.2d 179 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1042 , 88 S.Ct. 1635 , 20 L.Ed.2d 303 (1968).
green
Ahmad v. Burke (1977)
Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 180 (1st Cir. 1974), quoting Charles Simkin & Sons, Inc. v. State Univ.
green
Cullen v. NEW YORK STATE CIVIL SERV. COMN. (1977)
Whitten Jr., Inc. v. State University Construction Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 179 (1st Cir. 1974) (Moore, J.); Sams v. New York State Board of Parole, 352 F.Supp. 296, 299 (S.D.N.Y.1972).
Moore, J.
green
Cullen v. New York State Civil Service Commission (1977)
Whitten Jr., Inc. v. State University Construction Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 179 (1st Cir. 1974) (Moore, J.); Sams v. New York State Board of Parole, 352 F.Supp. 296, 299 (S.D.N.Y.1972).
Moore, J.
green
Savage v. Kibbee (1976)
Whitten, Jr., Inc. v. State University Construction Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 179-80 (1st Cir. 1974); Gordenstein, supra, 381 F.Supp. at 720-21 .
green
Condosta v. Vermont Electric Cooperative, Inc. (1975)
Whitten, Jr., Inc. v. State University Construction Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 179-180 (1st Cir. 1974).
green
Morris v. Board of Education of Laurel Sch. Dist. (1975)
Turning to the questions of whether the District has the power to pay a judgment on its own initiative and whether payment would be made with state funds—the questions which have generally been considered to be of critical importance, Urbano v. Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison, supra; Whitten v. State University Construction Fund, 493 F.2d 177, 180 (1st Cir. 1974)—the case for exclusion of the district from the Eleventh Amendment’s shield becomes quite persuasive.
green
United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman (1975)
Compare Matherson v. Long Island State Park Comm’n, 442 F. 2d 566 (CA2 1971), and Zeidner v. Wuljorst, 197 F. Supp. 23, 25 (EDNY 1961), with Whitten v. State University Construction Fund, 493 F. 2d 177 (CA1 1974), and Charles Simkin & Sons, Inc. v. State University Construction Fund, 352 F. Supp. 177 (SDNY), aff'd mem., 486 F. 2d 1393 (CA2 1973).