How cited: Lippert v. Pacific Sugar Corporation · Go Syfert

Lippert v. Pacific Sugar Corporation (1917)

green · 40 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 4
Treatment trajectory · 1917 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
191719712026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Radisich v. Franco-Italian Packing Co. (1945)
Rule Authority · Cal. Ct. App.
Co. (1919), 40 Cal.App. 689, 691 [ 181 P. 669 ]; Atkinson v. United Railroads of S. F. (1925), 71 Cal.App. 82, 88-95 [ 234 P. 863 ]; Lippert v. Pacific Sugar Corporation (1917), 33 Cal.App. 198, 208 [ 164 P. 810 ] ; Seney v. Pickwick Stages (1927), 82 Cal.App. 226, 229 [ 255 P. 279 ].) Paragraph XII, however, goes further and alleges negligence spe *839 cifically, to wit, that the injuries which caused the death of decedent were directly caused by the negligence of defendant…
green Woodward v. Southern Pacific Co. (1939)
Rule Authority · Cal. Ct. App.
Under somewhat similar circumstances regarding the weight to be given to a witness’ testimony, in the case of Lippert v. Pacific Sugar Corp., 33 Cal. App. 198, 212 [ 164 Pac. 810 ], where a workman was killed in the explosion of a boiler and the testimony of the master mechanic was involved, the court said: “We do not think the jury were compelled to accept at its face value the testimony of Connolly as to verbal instructions or conversations with Lippert, who being dead cou…
green Hubbert v. Aztec Brewing Co. (1938)
Rule Authority · Cal. Ct. App.
Co., 27 Cal. App. 688 [ 151 Pac. 35 ], Lippert v. Pacific Sugar Corp., 33 Cal. App. 198, 208 [ 164 Pac. 810 ], Hallawell v. Union Oil Co., 36 Cal. App. 672 [ 173 Pac. 177 ], Phoenix Assur.
green Horney v. Dillingham (1927)
Rule Authority · Cal. Ct. App.
Co., supra, the court said: “Where the explanation leaves it doubtful as to whether or not the ultimate cause of the injury is the negligence of the party charged it is proper to instruct the jury as to the res ipsa loquitur doctrine”; and such is the rule as stated in effect in the following cases: Lippert v. Pacific Sugar Corp., 33 Cal. App. 198, 208 [ 164 Pac. 810 ]; Soto v. Spring Valley Water Co., 39 Cal. App. 187 [ 178 Pac. 305 ] , it being further held in the cases la…