How cited: Hood Canal Sand And Gravel v. Peter Goldmark · Go Syfert

Hood Canal Sand And Gravel v. Peter Goldmark (2016)

green · 28 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 3 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2018 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201820222026
Cited · Wash. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Hood Canal Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Goldmark, 195 Wn. App. 284, 300 , 381 P.3d 95 (2016) (determining chapters that individually granted DNR “expansive authority to grant easements” and “certain narrow authority . . . to grant easements” did not conflict).
determining chapters that individually granted DNR “expansive authority to grant easements” and “certain narrow authority . . . to grant easements” did not conflict
Cited · Wash. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Hood Canal Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Goldmark, 195 Wn. App. 284, 295, 381 P.3d 95 (2016) (court does not abuse its discretion by deviating from CR 56’s timing requirements if there is adequate notice and time to prepare).
court does not abuse its discretion by deviating from CR 56’s timing requirements if there is adequate notice and time to prepare
Cited (see also) · Wash. Ct. App. · signal: see also
We start with the basic premise that DLI, as a state agency, “may only do that which it is authorized to do by the Legislature.” Rettkowski v. Dep’t of Ecology, 122 Wn.2d 219, 226 , 858 P.2d 232 (1993); see also Hood Canal Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Goldmark, 195 Wn.