State v. Cardenas (2016)
green
· 38 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201620212026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State v. Hamed (2017)
Montgomery No. 19013, 2002-Ohio-2278 , ¶ 7 (citing State v. Adams, 62 Ohio St.2d 151, 157 , 404 N.E.2d 144 (1980))). {¶ 8} With respect to the first prong of a claim of ineffective assistance, a “ ‘defense attorney has a duty to advise a noncitizen client that “pending criminal charges may carry a risk of adverse immigration consequences,” and if it is “truly clear” what those consequences are, [then] counsel must correctly advise the defendant of [them].’ ” -5- Cardenas, 20…
green
State v. Canas (2025)
See State v. Cardenas, 2016-Ohio-5537 (2d Dist.) (in a hearing to withdraw guilty plea because of ineffective assistance, trial attorney submitted an affidavit stating he did not discuss No. 24AP-209 5 deportation with defendant).
green
State v. McDaniel (2023)
See also State v. Cardenas, 2016-Ohio-5537 , 61 N.E.3d 20 , ¶ 29 (2d Dist.).
green
State v. Muhire (2022)
Accord State v. Cardenas, 2016-Ohio-5537 , 61 N.E.3d 20 , ¶ 39 (2d Dist.). “ ‘A defense attorney’s failure to advise [his or her] client accordingly satisfies the first prong of Strickland, as it constitutes deficient performance.’ ” Cardenas at ¶ 39, quoting Galdamez at ¶ 16.
green
State v. Thomson (2020)
See id. at 13-15. {¶ 8} To prevail on a claim of “ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must satisfy the two-pronged test in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).” State v. Cardenas, 2016-Ohio-5537 , 61 N.E.3d 20 , ¶ 38 (2d Dist.).
green
State v. Olsen (2019)
See Appellant’s Br. 11-12. {¶ 9} To prevail on a claim of “ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must -6- satisfy the two-pronged test in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).” State v. Cardenas, 2016-Ohio-5537 , 61 N.E.3d 20 , ¶ 38 (2d Dist.).