How cited: Ray Corbitt v. Brent Andersen, in His Official Capacity and Individually · Go Syfert

Ray Corbitt v. Brent Andersen, in His Official Capacity and Individually (1985)

green · 55 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 24 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198520052026
Rule Authority · 10th Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion
Apr. 18, 1986) (finding that no private right of action exists). 5 In endeavoring to ascertain the proper construction of state law where no authoritative state court decision exists, we acknowledge that “[t]he views of a resident federal district judge concerning the local law of his home state are entitled to some deference by an appellate court.” Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1475 (10th Cir.1985); see also Inryco, Inc. v. CGR Bldg.
Rule Authority · 10th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
The New Mexico courts have not spoken authoritatively on the subject. 6 Generally, we must accord at least some deference to the district court’s construction of the substantive law of the state in which it sits. 7 See American Coleman Co. v. Intrawest *1421 Bank of Southglenn, 887 F.2d 1382 , 1385 (10th Cir.1989); Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1475 (10th Cir.1985).
green No. 85-2819 (1988)
Rule Authority · 10th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 701 , 96 S.Ct. 1155, 1160 , 47 L.Ed.2d 405 (1976); Koerpel v. Heckler, 797 F.2d 858, 865 (10th Cir.1986); Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1474 (10th Cir.1985); McGhee v. Draper, 639 F.2d 639, 643 (10th Cir.1981).
green Donohue v. Hoey (2004)
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Phelps, 886 F.2d at 1268 ; Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1474-75 (10th Cir.1985). 98 .
green Cotton v. Simmons (2002)
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 709 , 96 S.Ct. 1155 , 47 L.Ed.2d 405 (1976); Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1474-75 (10th Cir.1985).
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
We review such questions de novo, In re Ruti-Sweetwater, Inc., 836 F.2d 1263 , 1266 (10th Cir.1988), although “[t]he views of a resident federal district judge concerning the local law of his home state are entitled to some deference....” Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1475 (10th Cir.1985).
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 701 , 96 S.Ct. 1155, 1160 , 47 L.Ed. 2d 405 (1976); Koerpel v. Heckler, 797 F.2d 858, 865 (10th Cir.1986); Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1474 (10th Cir.1985); McGhee v. Draper, 639 F.2d 639, 643 (10th Cir.1981).
Rule Authority · D.N.M.
May 6, 2008) (Browning, J.) (citing Six v. Henry, 42 F.3d 582, 585 (10th Cir.1994); Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1474-75 (10thCir.1985)).
Rule Authority · D. Colo.
Phelps, 886 F.2d at 1268 ; Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1474-75 (10th Cir.1985).
green Hourigan v. Cassidy (2001)
Rule Authority · N.M. Ct. App.
Espanola Way Corp. v. Meyerson, 690 F.2d 827, 828-29 (11th Cir.1982) (finding where harassment and multiple citations by building code and fire inspectors caused loss of rentals and business, a prima facie liberty interest claim has been stated); Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1475 (10th Cir.1985) (finding that discrediting psychologist’s professional standing resulting in present harm to his established business relationships states a liberty interest claim). {15} Furt…
Rule Authority · D. Utah
Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 429 , 103 S.Ct. 1933, 1937 , 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983) (citing Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc., 390 U.S. 400, 402 , 88 S.Ct. 964, 966 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1263 (1968)); Wilson v. Stoker, 819 F.2d 943 , 951 (10th Cir.1987); Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1475 (10th Cir.1985); see also S.Rep.
Rule Authority · D. Utah
Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1475 (10th Cir.1985).
green Bee v. Greaves (1987)
Rule Authority · D. Utah
Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1475 (10th Cir.1985).
green Ward v. Anderson (2007)
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1475 (10th Cir.1985) (holding that the plaintiff's burden to show a procedural due process injury was met with sufficient evidence from which the jury "could reasonably conclude that [defendant’s actions weakened and devalued" his business); cf. Phelps v. Wichita Eagle-Beacon, 886 F.2d 1262, 1268 (10th Cir.1989) (distinguishing Corbitt as applying only where "the plaintiff has alleged and presented evidence of present harm to his estab…
Cited (see also) · 7th Cir. · signal: compare
Compare Harris v. Harvey, 605 F.2d 330, 337 (7th Cir. 1979); Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1475 (10th Cir. 1985).
Cited (see also) · 7th Cir. · signal: compare
Compare Harris v. Harvey, 605 F.2d 330, 337 (7th Cir.1979); Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1475 (10th Cir.1985).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See id. at 1473 .
Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1474-75 (10th Cir.1985) (holding that damage to reputation plus the impairment of future employment constitutes a due process violation); Doe v. United States Dep't of Justice, 753 F.2d 1092, 1106 (D.C.Cir.1985) (holding that damage to one's reputation plus termination from employment would jeopardize that individual's future employment opportunities with the government and thus constitutes a due process violation under Paul ).
Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: compare
Compare McCune v. City of Grand Rapids, 842 F.2d 903, 906 (6th Cir.1988) with Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1474 (10th Cir.1985).
green Smith v. Williams (2021)
Cited (see also) · D. Kan. · signal: see also
Plaintiff specifically alleges that she and Labette Health engaged in negotiations aimed at Plaintiff continuing her role for Labette Health but were unable to reach an 32 Id.; see also Corbitt v. Anderson, 778 F.2d 1471, 1474-75 (10th Cir. 1985) (citing Bd. of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 (1972)).
citing Bd. of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 (1972)
green Smith v. Holtz (1994)
Cited (see also) · M.D. Penn. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., McCune v. City of Grand Rapids, 842 F.2d 903, 906 (6th Cir.1988) and Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1474 (10th Cir. 1985).
Cited · W.D. Mo. · signal: see
See Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1474 (10th Cir.1985) (“[T]he right to pursue one’s chosen profession unfettered by state action which does not comport with the 14th Amendment” distinguished plaintiff’s § 1983 claim from “only a garden variety state libel case.”); Mullinax v. McElhenney, 672 F.Supp. 1449, 1452 (N.D.Ga.1987) (recognizing plaintiff’s constitutionally protected right “to practice her chosen profession free from unreasonable government interference”).
Cited · D. Wyo. · signal: see
See Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471 , 1474 n. ** (10th Cir.1985).
Cited · Me. · signal: see
See Corbitt v. Andersen, 778 F.2d 1471, 1474-75 (10th Cir.1985) (applying Paul v. Davis in an action factually similar to the instant case); see also Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2707 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).