Solomon v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. (1986)
neutral
· 1 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 48 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
yellow
EJS Properties, LLC v. City of Toledo (2012)
See Akers v. Alvey, 338 F.3d 491, 495-96 (6th Cir.2003) (holding bare-bones statement of “no just reason for delay” questionable but sufficient to confer jurisdiction); but see Solomon, 782 F.2d at 62 (holding bare-bones statement of “no just reason for delay” insufficient to convey jurisdiction).
holding bare-bones statement of “no just reason for delay” insufficient to convey jurisdiction
green
William Alvin Smith, Cross-Appellee v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cro… (1989)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir.1986) ("[Rule 54(b) ] attempts to strike a balance between the undesirability of piecemeal appeals and the need for making review available at a time that best serves the needs of the parties"). 41 Unless Rule 54(b) certification is judiciously invoked, however, it can have precisely the opposite effect: parties dissatisfied with the results of the judgment and/or subsequent appeals will continue to press their unabandoned claims in the district…
"[Rule 54(b) ] attempts to strike a balance between the undesirability of piecemeal appeals and the need for making review available at a time that best serves the needs of the parties"
green
Robert Medley v. Shelby Cnty., Ky. (2017)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 61 (6th Cir. 1986) (“Certainly a proper exercise of discretion under Rule 54(b) requires the district court to do more than just recite the 54(b) formula of ‘no just reason for delay.’”); see also Corrosioneering, Inc. v. Thyssen Envtl.
“Certainly a proper exercise of discretion under Rule 54(b) requires the district court to do more than just recite the 54(b) formula of ‘no just reason for delay.’”
green
Richard Adler v. Elk Glenn, LLC (2014)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 61 (6th Cir.1986).
green
Sidney Coal Co. v. Social Security Administration (2004)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 61 (6th Cir.1986).
green
Lock v. Uticon, Inc. (2004)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 61 (6th Cir.1986).
green
John Cooper v. United States (1989)
See Solomon, 782 F.2d at 61 ("If no reasons [are] given then we cannot tell if there has been an abuse of discretion.
"If no reasons [are] given then we cannot tell if there has been an abuse of discretion. Our judgment as to the propriety of certification will be speculative...."
green
Tressa Sherrod v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (2022)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir.1986)).
green
S2 Yachts, Inc. v. ERH Marine Corp. (2021)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir. 1986).
green
Novia Commc'ns v. Jesse Weatherby (2020)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 61 (6th Cir. 1986).
green
David Gavitt v. Bruce Born (2016)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir. 1986)).
green
Smith v. City of Inkster (2016)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 59-60 (6th Cir.1986).
green
James Dean v. County of Gage (2015)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 62 (6th Cir.1986) and Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Archer, 655 F.2d 962, 965 (9th Cir.1981))).
green
James Dean v. County of Gage (2015)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 62 (6th Cir.1986) and Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Archer, 655 F.2d 962, 965 (9th Cir.1981))).
green
Michael Timmons v. Bill Oldham (2013)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 59-60 (6th Cir.1986).
green
U.S. Citizens Association v. Kathleen Sebeliux (2013)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 61 (6th Cir.1986).
green
Pittman Ex Rel. Sykes v. Franklin (2008)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir.1986).
green
Myron Lowery v. Federal Express Corporation and Fedex Express, Inc., a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Federal Exp… (2005)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir.1986).
green
Gross v. Pirtle (2004)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 61 (6th Cir.1986)); Braswell Shipyards, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc., 2 F.3d 1331, 1336 (4th Cir.1993), while other circuits do not mandate such explanation but find it desirable, see, e.g., Hayden v. McDonald, 719 F.2d 266, 269 (8th Cir.1983); Explosives Supply Co., Inc. v. Columbia Nitrogen Corp., 691 F.2d 486, 486 (11th Cir.1982).
green
Hafer v. Webb (2003)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 59-60 (6th Cir.1986).
green
Whitehead v. Chandler (2003)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 59-60 (6th Cir.1986).
green
Bell v. Commins (2001)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 59-60 (6th Cir.1986).
green
Good v. Ohio Edison Co. (1997)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir.1986).
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir. 1986)).
green
Great Lakes Packers, Inc. v. PK Produce (2022)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 61-62 (6th Cir. 1986); Gen.
green
Susan E. Rich v. The City of Chattanooga (2014)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 62 (6th Cir.1986).
green
FSGBank, N.A. v. Sushan K. Anand (2012)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 62 (6th Cir.1986).
green
Myatt v. PECO FOODS OF MISSISSIPPI, INC. (2009)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 61 (6th Cir.1986) (a district court should review “competing considerations” in making its Rule 54(b) certification, and “state the ones considered to be most important”).
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir. 1986)).
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 62 (6th Cir. 1986) (“The record indicates the plaintiffs proceed on similar legal theories against each defendant . . . .
green
Passmore v. Fidelity Investments (2025)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir. 1986)).
green
Broadnax v. United States (2024)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 62 (6th Cir. 1986).
green
Dunigan v. Thomas (2024)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir. 1986)).
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir. 1986) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir. 1986) 3 Allianz claims it is asking for an “interlocutory” appeal.
green
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Winget (2021)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 601-62 (6th Cir. 1986)).
green
Cordts v. Griffis (2021)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 601-62 (6th Cir. 1986)).
green
AP Alternatives, LLC v. Rosendin Electric, Inc. (2020)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 62 (6th Cir. 1986).
green
Greene v. Crawford County (2020)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir. 1986). “[W]hen multiple parties are involved, the court may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay.” Fed.
green
Ball v. Kasich (2020)
Certainly a proper exercise of discretion under Rule 54(b) requires the district court do more than just recite the 54(b) formula of “no just reason for delay.” Solomon, 782 F.2d at 61 (citations omitted, emphasis supplied).
citations omitted, emphasis supplied
green
Eakin Enterprises, Inc. v. Stratton Ballew, PLLC (2020)
Solomon v. Aetna Life Insurance Co., 782 F.2d 58, 61 (6th Cir. 1986).
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir. 1986)).
green
Galindo v. Valley View Ass'n (2017)
Rail Corp., 861 F.2d at 326 ; Solomon, 782 F.2d at 62; see also 10 Moore’s Federal Practice § 54.23[l][a]; 10 Federal Practice and Procedure § 2659, at 108-10.
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 61-62 (6th Cir. 1986)).
green
G.D. Deal Holdings, Inc. v. Baker Energy, Inc. (2007)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60-61 (6th Cir.1986); Curry v. Scott, 249 F.3d 493, 499 (6th Cir.2001); see also Fed.R.Civ.R. 54(b)(stating “[wjhen more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason fo…
green
General Elec. Co. v. Anson Stamping Co. Inc. (2006)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir.1986).
green
Nelbro Packing Co. v. Baypack Fisheries, L.L.C. (2000)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 60 (6th Cir. 1986).
green
Gencorp, Inc. v. AIU Insurance (1997)
Co., 782 F.2d 58, 61 (6th Cir.1986).