How cited: LaChica v. Russell Stover Chocolates · Go Syfert

LaChica v. Russell Stover Chocolates (2021)

green · 3 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 3 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Cited · D. Kan. · signal: see
See LaChica v. Russell Stover Chocolates, LLC, 853 Fed.Appx. 283 , 288 (10th Cir. 2021); Campbell v. Mart, 2000 WL 826259 *2 (10th Cir. 2000); Cone v. Longmont United Hosp.
Cited (see also) · D. Kan. · signal: see also
McKnight v. Kimberly Clark Corp., 149 F.3d 1125, 1129 (10th Cir. 1998); see also LaChica v. Russell Stover Chocolates, LLC, 853 F. App’x 283 at 287-88 (10th Cir. 2021). e. Finally, Mitten claims she was subjected to differential treatment because other employees investigated for similar misconduct received lighter discipline than her.
Cited (see also) · D. Kan. · signal: see also
Ass’n, 14 F.3d 526, 531 (10th Cir. 1994); see also LaChica v. Russell Stover Chocolates, LLC, 853 F. App’x 283 , 288 (10th Cir. 2021) (reiterating that “stray remarks and anecdotal evidence of discrimination unrelated to [the adverse employment action]” are insufficient to show discriminatory animus (quotation cleaned up)).
reiterating that “stray remarks and anecdotal evidence of discrimination unrelated to [the adverse employment action]” are insufficient to show discriminatory animus (quotation cleaned up)