How cited: Southern Railway Company v. Georgia Kraft Company · Go Syfert

Southern Railway Company v. Georgia Kraft Company (1987)

green · 35 citation events across 8 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198920072026
Rule Authority · 11th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Appellant cites the rule that “an indemnitee, after giving the indemnitor notice and an opportunity to defend, could settle a lawsuit and claim indemnity upon a showing that the decision to settle was reasonable.” Southern Ry. v. Georgia Kraft Co., 823 F.2d 478, 480 (11th Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · 11th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Appellant cites the rule that “an indemnitee, after giving the indemnitor notice and an opportunity to defend, could settle a lawsuit and claim indemnity upon a showing that the decision to settle was reasonable.” Southern Ry. v. Georgia Kraft Co., 823 F.2d 478, 480 (11th Cir. 1987).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Thus, the question of the coverage of the indemnity contract between Georgia Kraft and Southern Railway remains to be decided. 823 F.2d 478, 480-81 (11th Cir.1987) (citations omitted) (footnotes omitted) (emphasis added).
Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co. n Georgia Kraft Co., 823 F.2d 478, 480-81 (11th Cir.1987); Kaydon Acquisition Corp. n Custom Mfg., Inc., 301 F.Supp.2d 945, 959 (N.D.Iowa 2004) (citing cases); Peerless Landfill Co. v. Haleyville Solid Waste Disposal Auth., 941 So.2d 312, 317 (Ala.Civ.App.2006); Maurice T.
citing cases
Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.
Co. v. Ga. Kraft Co., 823 F.2d 478, 480 (11th Cir. 1987).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.
Co. v. Ga. Kraft Co., 823 F.2d 478, 480 (11th Cir.1987).
Rule Authority · S.D. Ga.
Co. v. Georgia Kraft Co., 823 F.2d 478, 480 (11th Cir.1987).
Cited · N.D. Ga. · signal: see
See Southern Railway Co. v. Georgia Kraft Co., 823 F.2d 478 (11th Cir.1987); Southern Railway Co. v. Brunswick Pulp & Paper Co., 376 F.Supp. 96 (S.D.Ga.1974); and Union Camp Corp. v. Louisville & Nashville R.R.