How cited: Torres v. Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC · Go Syfert

Torres v. Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC (2016)

green · 15 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · Tenn.
In re Bridgestone/Firestone, 286 S.W.3d 898, 909 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008) (holding that a change in circumstances prevented the application of collateral estoppel), perm. app. denied, (Tenn. Mar. 23, 2009); Torres v. Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC., 498 S.W.3d 565, 577 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016), perm. app. denied, (Tenn. Aug. 18, 2016).
Quote Authority · Tenn. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Torres v. Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 498 S.W.3d 565, 577 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016) (“This Court may affirm the trial court even if the trial court reached the correct result for the wrong reason.”).
“This Court may affirm the trial court even if the trial court reached the correct result for the wrong reason.”
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Torres v. Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 498 S.W.3d 565, 577 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). 12 Furthermore, we note that Article XII of the Declaration, entitled “Architectural Review Committee [ARC],” provides that Developer “shall continue to have the exclusive authority to appoint the Members of the [ARC] until such time as it shall in writing expressly confer such authority to [HOA].” Clearly, this portion of the Declaration afforded Developer full control of the ARC ap…
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Tire, LLC, 498 S.W.3d 565, 577 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016) (quoting Arnold v. City of Chattanooga, 19 S.W.3d 779, 789 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999)). -9- . . .
quoting Arnold v. City of Chattanooga, 19 S.W.3d 779, 789 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999)
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Tire, LLC, 498 S.W.3d 565, 577 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016); Biles v. Roby, No. W2016-02139-COA-R3-CV, 2017 WL 3447910 , at *6, n.3 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 11, 2017). - 30 - VIII.
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Tire, LLC, 498 S.W.2d 565, 577 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016)); see State v. Diaz de la Portilla, 177 So.3d 965, 974 (Fla. 2015) (describing the “tipsy coach doctrine” which permits a reviewing court to affirm the decision of a lower court that reaches the right result for the wrong reason).
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Torres v. Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 498 S.W.3d 565, 573 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Tire, LLC., 498 S.W.3d 565, 577 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016) (citing Arnold v. City of Chattanooga, 19 S.W.3d 779, 789 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999)).
citing Arnold v. City of Chattanooga, 19 S.W.3d 779, 789 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999)
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Tire, LLC., 498 S.W.3d 565, 577 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016), perm. app. denied (Tenn. Aug. 18, 2016). 15 examine the “natural and ordinary meaning of the language used” in the TPLA, “without a forced or subtle construction that would limit or extend the meaning of the language.” See, e.g., Tuggle v. Allright Parking Sys., Inc., 922 S.W.2d 105, 107 (Tenn. 1996).
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Tire, LLC, 498 S.W.3d 565, 577 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
Cited · Tenn. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Torres v. Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 498 S.W.3d 565, 577 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016); Biles v. Roby, No. W2016-02139-COA-R3-CV, 2017 WL 3447910 , at *6, n.3 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 11, 2017). - 15 - We reiterate that a court abuses its discretion “when it causes an injustice to the party challenging the decision by (1) applying an incorrect legal standard, (2) reaching an illogical or unreasonable decision, or (3) basing its decision on a clearly erroneous assessment…
Cited (see also) · Tenn. Ct. App. · signal: see also
Firestone I, 138 S.W.3d at 210 ; see also Torres, 498 S.W.3d at 577 . 10 product defects; accordingly, evidence relating to the Defendant’s post-sale conduct was irrelevant and therefore inadmissible.