How cited: Allen v. State · Go Syfert

Allen v. State (2007)

green · 15 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · Ind. Ct. App.
“An abuse of discretion occurs if the decision is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances.” Allen v. State, 875 N.E.2d 783, 788 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
Rule Authority · Ind. Ct. App.
“An abuse of discretion occurs if the decision is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances.” Allen v. State, 875 N.E.2d 783, 788 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
Rule Authority · Ind. Ct. App.
“An abuse of discretion occurs if the decision is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances.” Allen v. State, 875 N.E.2d 783, 788 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). [4] When a trial court imposes a felony sentence, it is required to issue a sentencing statement “that includes a reasonably detailed recitation of the trial court’s reasons for the sentence imposed.” Anglemyer v. State, 868 N.E.2d 482, 484-85 (Ind. 2007), clarified on reh’g on other grounds, 875 N.E…
Rule Authority · Ind. Ct. App.
Allen v. State, 875 N.E.2d 783, 788 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) (quotations omitted).
quotations omitted
Rule Authority · Ind. Ct. App.
“An abuse of discretion occurs if the decision is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances.” Allen v. State, 875 N.E.2d 783, 788 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
Rule Authority · Ind. Ct. App.
“An abuse of discretion occurs if the decision is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances.” Allen v. State, 875 N.E.2d 783, 788 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). 3 Ind. Code § 35-43-2-1 .5; Ind. Code § 35-41-5-1 . 4 Ind. Code § 35-42-4-2 .5. 5 Ind. Code § 35-42-2-2 . 6 Ind. Code § 35-43-1-2 .
Rule Authority · Ind. Ct. App.
Allen v. State, 875 N.E.2d 783, 788 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
Rule Authority · Ind. Ct. App.
Allen v. State, 875 N.E.2d 783, 788 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
Rule Authority · Ind. Ct. App.
Allen v. State, 875 N.E.2d 783, 788 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
green Sharkey v. State (2012)
Rule Authority · Ind. Ct. App.
Allen v. State, 875 N.E.2d 783, 788 (Ind.Ct.App.2007).
Cited · Ind. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Allen v. State, 875 N.E.2d 783 , 788 n. 8 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
Cited · Ind. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Allen v. State, 875 N.E.2d 783 , 788 n.8 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
Cited · Ind. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Allen v. State, 875 N.E.2d 783 , 788 n.8 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) (noting that the failure to develop a separate inappropriateness argument results in waiver). 4
noting that the failure to develop a separate inappropriateness argument results in waiver