In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation (2014)
green
· 119 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 22 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201420202026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Muszkatel v. 90 Church Street Ltd. Partnership (2014)
Accordingly, for the reasons previously elaborated in In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 44 F.Supp.3d 409, 426-27 , No. 09-cv-680, 2014 WL 4446153, at *11-12 (S.D.N.Y.
green
Auclair v. Corning Incorporated (2024)
Grp., LLC, 161 A.D.3d 666 , 667-68 (1st Dep't 2018) (citing Becerra v. Promenade Apartments Inc., 126 A.D.3d 557, 558 (1st Dep't 2015)); see also In re World Trade Ctr., 44 F. Supp. 3d at 441 ("Rule 23- 1.5(c), which requires that equipment be 'immediately repaired or restored' and 'immediately removed from the job site if damaged,' is a sufficiently 'concrete, positive' command to support [a] section 241(6) claim").
"Rule 23- 1.5(c), which requires that equipment be 'immediately repaired or restored' and 'immediately removed from the job site if damaged,' is a sufficiently 'concrete, positive' command to support [a] section 241(6) claim"
green
Kwasnik v. 160 Water Street, Inc. (2014)
Accordingly, for the reasons previously elaborated in In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 44 F.Supp.3d 409, 425-28 , No. 09-cv-680, 2014 WL 4446153, at *11-12 (S.D.N.Y.
green
Acosta v. Tribeca Landing L.L.C. (2019)
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d at 437 (“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock.
“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock. Such work does not constitute a ‘significant physical change to the configuration or composition’ of the building. Furthermore, the work performed at th…
green
Caiza v. Hillman Environmental Group, LLC. (2019)
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d at 437 (“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock.
“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock. Such work does not constitute a ‘significant physical change to the configuration or composition’ of the building. Furthermore, the work performed at th…
green
Bunay v. 160 Water Street, Inc. (2019)
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d at 437 (“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock.
“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock. Such work does not constitute a ‘significant physical change to the configuration or composition’ of the building. Furthermore, the work performed at th…
green
Bermeo v. Battery Park City Authority (2019)
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d at 437 (“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock.
“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock. Such work does not constitute a ‘significant physical change to the configuration or composition’ of the building. Furthermore, the work performed at th…
green
Bastidas v. 100 Church, LLC (2019)
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d at 437 (“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock.
“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock. Such work does not constitute a ‘significant physical change to the configuration or composition’ of the building. Furthermore, the work performed at th…
green
Ali v. 1 World Trade Center, L.L.C. (2019)
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d at 437 (“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock.
“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock. Such work does not constitute a ‘significant physical change to the configuration or composition’ of the building. Furthermore, the work performed at th…
green
Bunay v. 4101 Austin Blvd Corporation (2019)
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d at 437 (“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock.
“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock. Such work does not constitute a ‘significant physical change to the configuration or composition’ of the building. Furthermore, the work performed at th…
green
Astudillo v. 90 Church Street Limited Partnership (2019)
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d at 437 (“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock.
“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock. Such work does not constitute a ‘significant physical change to the configuration or composition’ of the building. Furthermore, the work performed at th…
green
Bogacki v. Battery Park City Authority (2019)
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d at 437 (“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock.
“The work performed to remediate these buildings consisted exclusively of cleaning the dust and removing contaminated debris, tiles and sheetrock. Such work does not constitute a ‘significant physical change to the configuration or composition’ of the building. Furthermore, the work performed at th…
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d 409, 436 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (cleaned up) (quoting Rizzuto, 91 N.Y.2d at 348-50 ).
cleaned up
green
Mohamed v. Freddie Mac (2024)
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d 409, 432 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (emphasis in original); see also Quilambaqui, 2021 WL 11690892 , at *5 (“[B]uilding owners and general contractors may be liable only if they had the authority to supervise and control the work actually being performed. . . .
emphasis in original
green
Morales v. C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. (2023)
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d 409, 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).
green
Zsuffa v. Britt Realty, LLC (2022)
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d 409, 427 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (“[A] party will be considered a statutory ‘agent’ if it has the authority to control the ‘injury producing activity.’” (citing Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & Son, 54 N.Y.2d 311 , 317- 18 (1981)).
“[A] party will be considered a statutory ‘agent’ if it has the authority to control the ‘injury producing activity.’” (citing Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & Son, 54 N.Y.2d 311 , 317- 18 (1981)
green
Corrales-Patino v. Procida Construction Corp. (2021)
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d 409, 440 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d 409, 431 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (“WTC”) (quoting In re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos Litig., 827 F. Supp. 1014 , 1052-53 (S.D.N.Y.1993), aff’d in part rev’d in part on other grounds, 52 F.3d 1124 (2d Cir. 1995)).
“WTC”
green
J.B. Sterling Company v. Verhelle (2020)
Site Litig., 44 F. Supp. 3d 409, 426 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (“[I]n deciding a motion for summary judgment, a District Court is not required to scour the record on its own in a search for evidence where the non-moving party fails to adequately present it” (quotation omitted)); Meaney v. CHS Acquisition Corp., 103 F. Supp. 2d 104, 110 (N.D.N.Y. 2000) (“The Court is not required to scour the record looking for factual disputes nor to scour the party’s various submissions to piece toge…
“[I]n deciding a motion for summary judgment, a District Court is not required to scour the record on its own in a search for evidence where the non-moving party fails to adequately present it” (quotation omitted)
green
Lincho v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. (2018)
Id. at 428-29 (internal punctuation omitted).
internal punctuation omitted
green
Corwin v. NYC Bike Share, LLC (2017)
Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig., 44 F.Supp.3d 409, 430 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (finding that Espinal and Moch stood for “the general public policy that courts will not impose a tort duty on a contracting party where doing so would expose the party to potentially unlimited and undefined liability” and finding a duty where there was “no risk of ... boundless tort liability”).
green
Kowalewski v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas (2014)
Accordingly, for the reasons previously elaborated in In re World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation, 44 F.Supp.3d 409, 426-28 , No. 09-cv-680, 2014 WL 4446153, at *11-12 (S.D.N.Y.