State v. Barber (2001)
green
· 55 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 14 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200120132026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State v. Harvey (2026)
The claim is reviewable under Golding because the claim is of constitutional magnitude alleging the violation of a fundamental right; see State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 671 , 781 A.2d 464 (“[i]f double jeopardy claims arising in the context of a single trial are raised for the first time on appeal, these claims are reviewable” (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001); and the record permits us to review the claim.
“[i]f double jeopardy claims arising in the context of a single trial are raised for the first time on appeal, these claims are reviewable” (internal quotation marks omitted)
green
State v. Oscar H. (2021)
See, e.g., State v. Chicano, 216 Conn. 699, 704 , 584 A.2d 425 (1990), overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Polanco, 308 Conn. 242 , 61 A.3d 1084 (2013); see also State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 671 , 781 A.2d 464 (‘‘[i]f double jeopardy claims arising in the context of a single trial are raised for the first time on appeal, these claims are reviewable’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
‘‘[i]f double jeopardy claims arising in the context of a single trial are raised for the first time on appeal, these claims are reviewable’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
green
State v. Porfil (2019)
See State v. Slaughter, 151 Conn. App. 340 , 349, 95 A.3d 1160 (detectives’ conclusions that defendant’s conduct was consistent with that of drug sellers were supported by testimony that neighborhood in which purported sales occurred was known to be high crime area in which drug sales took place), cert. denied, 314 Conn. 916 , 100 A.3d 405 (2014); see also State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 667 , 781 A.2d 464 (‘‘[e]vidence demonstrating that the defendant was present in a k…
‘‘[e]vidence demonstrating that the defendant was present in a known drug trafficking area further suggests an intent to sell’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
green
State v. Walker (2018)
See State v. Barber , 64 Conn. App. 659 , 671, 781 A.2d 464 ("[i]f double jeopardy claims arising in the context of a single trial are raised for the first time on appeal, these claims are reviewable" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
green
State v. Porter (2016)
See State v. Laws, 37 Conn.App. 276 , 289, 655 A.2d 1131 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 907 , 659 A.2d 1210 (1995) ; see also State v. Barber, 64 Conn.App. 659 , 671, 781 A.2d 464 ("[i]f double jeopardy claims arising in the context of a single trial are raised for the first time on appeal, these claims are reviewable" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
green
State v. Slaughter (2014)
See State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 667 , 781 A.2d 464 (‘‘[e]vi- dence demonstrating that the defendant was present in a known drug trafficking area further suggests an intent to sell’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
green
State v. Thompson (2013)
See State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 670 , 781 A.2d 464 (“defendant may not pursue one course of action at trial for tactical reasons and later on appeal argue that the path he rejected should now be open to him” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001); see also State v. Paredes, 139 Conn. App. 135, 141-45 , 54 A.3d 1073 (2012) (claim that jury’s exposure to complainant’s statement to third party witness that defendant had r…
green
State v. Holloway (2009)
See also State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 675-76 , 781 A.2d 464 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
green
Charles v. Commissioner of Correction (2009)
See also State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 675-76 , 781 A.2d 464 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
green
State v. Martin (2008)
See State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 677 , 781 A.2d 464 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
green
State v. Sanchez (2004)
See State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 666 , 781 A.2d 464 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
green
State v. Cotton (2003)
See State v. Hill, 237 Conn. 81, 98-99 , 675 A.2d 866 (1996); State v. Tweedy, 219 Conn. 489 , 494 n.7, 594 A.2d 906 (1991); see also State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 671 , 781 A.2d 464 (“[i]f double jeopardy claims arising in the context of a single trial are raised for the first time on appeal, these claims are reviewable”), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
green
State v. Lindo (2003)
See State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 671 , 781 A.2d 464 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
green
State v. Jones (2002)
See State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 666 , 781 A.2d 464 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).