United States v. Larry Flenoid (2005)
green
· 23 citation events
across 6 courts.
Showing the 10 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200920172026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Dawn Lawrey v. Kearney Clinic, P.C. (2014)
See Shelton v. Kennedy Funding, Inc., 622 F.3d 943 , 958-59 & n.14 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v. Davis, 534 F.3d 903, 920-21 (8th Cir. 2008); United States v. Flenoid, 415 F.3d 974, 976 (8th Cir. 2005); United States v. Malik, 345 F.3d 999, 1001 (8th Cir. 2003); see also WWP, Inc. v. Wounded Warriors Family Support, Inc., 628 F.3d 1032, 1039-40 (8th Cir. 2011) (applying the above line of cases rather than the rule stated in Hy-Vee).
green
United States v. Christopher Grant (2013)
See, e.g., Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61, 74 , 117 S.Ct. 467 , 136 L.Ed.2d 437 (1996) (“Lewis, by timely moving for remand, did all that was required to preserve his objection to removal.”); United States v. Flenoid, 415 F.3d 974, 976 (8th Cir.2005) (“The government argues that ‘[a] motion in limine is not a substitute for an objection and does not alone preserve error for review.’ We disagree.” (internal citation omitted)); United States v. Johnson, 906 F.2d 1285, …
green
United States v. Lamar McCullough (2026)
In United States v. Flenoid, the “bloody fingerprints” were directly relevant to possession under § 922(g)(1). 415 F.3d 974, 976-77 (8th Cir. 2005).
green
United States v. Delvonn Battle (2014)
United States v. Flenoid, 415 F.3d 974, 976-77 (8th Cir.2005).
green
FLENOID v. WATSON (2022)
Flenoid, 415 F.3d at 975-76.
green
Stephen Grant v. Steven Zorn (2024)
See United States v. Flenoid, 415 F.3d 974, 976 (8th Cir. 2005).
green
United States v. Lester Brown (2024)
See United States v. Flenoid, 415 F.3d 974, 976 (8th Cir. 2005).
green
United States v. Xzaveon Peete (2019)
See United States v. Flenoid, 415 F.3d 974 , 976-77 (8th Cir. 2005) (concluding that although another witness had observed the defendant with a firearm independent of a shooting, evidence of the shooting was nonetheless admissible under Rule 403 because “Flenoid’s use of the firearm to commit murder does not alter its probative value on the crucial issue of possession”).
concluding that although another witness had observed the defendant with a firearm independent of a shooting, evidence of the shooting was nonetheless admissible under Rule 403 because “Flenoid’s use of the firearm to commit murder does not alter its probative value on the crucial issue of possessi…
green
Flenoid v. United States (2023)
United States v. Wade, 792 F. App’x 417 (8th Cir. 2020) (per curiam). 9 At Petitioner’s 2004 sentencing hearing the Court found by a preponderance of the evidence that Petitioner’s “shooting of Ricky Forehand was committed in the kidnapping of Ursula Page and/or the burglary of the Forehand residence and so constitutes a first-degree murder for the purposes of the Sentencing Guideline cross reference.” S. Tr. at 14.; see also United States v. Flenoid, 415 F.3d 974 , 975– 76 …
green
State v. Johnson (2009)
See United States v. Flenoid, 415 F.3d 974, 976 (8th Cir.2005). “ ‘Generally, parties must object to specific court action and state the reason underlying their objection so that the circuit court has an opportunity to correct any error.’ ” State v. Divan, 2006 SD 105, ¶ 9 , 724 N.W.2d 865, 869 (quoting State v. McCrary, 2004 SD 18, ¶ 15 , 676 N.W.2d 116, 121 ).