Bott v. Pratt (1885)
green
· 61 citation events
across 15 courts.
Showing the 2 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1900 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
190019632026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Motokazie! Inc. v. Rice County (2012)
Paul, 819 N.W.2d 172, 181-82 (Minn.App.2012) (“An ordinance is commonly defined as an ‘authoritative law or decree,’ especially ‘a municipal regulation.’ ” (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1208 (9th ed.2009))); see also Mayes v. Byers, 214 Minn. 54, 63 , 7 N.W.2d 403, 407 (1943) (“A city ordinance within its proper scope has the force and effect of law.”); Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323, 328 , 23 N.W. 237, 239 (1885) (“An ordinance which a municipal corporation is authorized to …
“An ordinance which a municipal corporation is authorized to make, is as binding on all persons within the corporate limits as any statute or other laws of the commonwealth.... ”
See, also, Bott v. Pratt, supra; Wright v. Railroad, 27 Ill. App. 200 .