Legacy Classic Furniture, Inc. v. United States (2011)
green
· 7 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 3 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.' Coal. v. United States (2019)
See Legacy Classic Furniture, Inc. v. United States, 35 CIT 1754 , 1755, 807 F. Supp. 2d 1353, 1356 (2011) (“Only when these so-called ‘(k)(1)’ sources are not dispositive is Commerce to proceed to consider the ‘(k)(2)’ factors[.]”).
“Only when these so-called ‘(k)(1)’ sources are not dispositive is Commerce to proceed to consider the ‘(k)(2)’ factors[.]”
green
Ethan Allen Operations, Inc. v. United States (2015)
Moreover, as in Legacy Classic Furniture, Inc. v. United States, Commerce’s reasoning, which inexplicably places more emphasis on the storage ability rather than the decorative aspects of the three chests, “could be employed to opposite effect.” See 807 F.Supp.2d 1353, 1359 (CIT 2011) (finding that Commerce unlawfully determined that a storage bench was more similar to an in-scope bedroom chest than an out-of-scope bench, even though the storage bench had key features of bot…
finding that Commerce unlawfully determined that a storage bench was more similar to an in-scope bedroom chest than an out-of-scope bench, even though the storage bench had key features of both
green
Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United States (2013)
See Legacy Classic Furniture, Inc. v. United States, 35 CIT -, -, 807 F.Supp.2d 1353, 1360 (2011) (remanding based on Commerce’s “cursory” treatment of record evidence).
remanding based on Commerce’s “cursory” treatment of record evidence