Marvin O. Johnson v. Eric K. Shinseki (2013)
green
· 51 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 11 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201320192026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
yellow
Willie E. Tatum v. Eric K. Shinseki (2014)
But see Johnson v. Shinseki, 26 Vet.App. 237 , 252 n. 10 (2013) (Kasold, J., dissenting) (noting, as an aside, that the proposition that the Court cannot disturb a finding favorable to a veteran is dictum and appears to misstate the law because the plain language of 38 U.S.C. § 7261 (a)(3) only states that the Court may set aside findings other than “findings of material fact adverse to the claimant ”).
Kasold, J., dissenting
green
Johnson v. McDonald (2014)
Johnson v. Shinseki, 26 Vet.
green
Freddie Butts v. Robert A. McDonald (2016)
Johnson I, 26 Vet.App. at 243.
green
Johnson v. McDonald (2016)
Johnson v. Shinseki, 26 Vet.App. 237, 243-45 (2013) (en banc) (Johnson I), rev’d sub nom.
en banc
green
11-15 033 (2016)
App. 111, 115 (2008), aff'd, 572 F.3d 1366 (2009); Johnson v. Shinseki, 26 Vet.
en banc
green
07-06 543 (2015)
Johnson v. Shinseki, 26 Vet.
green
Mary Vilfranc v. Robert A. McDonald (2017)
See Johnson v. Shinseki, 26 Vet.App. 237, 248 (2013) (Moorman, J., concurring) (“[W]e are bound by the high degree of deference that the ...
Moorman, J., concurring
green
Thomas F. Cacciola v. Sloan D. Gibson (2014)
See, e.g., Johnson v. Shinseki, 26 Vet.App. 237, 239 (2013) (en banc) (stating that the appellant did not address the Board's denial of certain matters and, therefore, he "abandoned any challenge to the Board's decision regarding these matters and the Court need not address the Board decision with respect to these matters").
en banc
green
Albert J. Thurlow v. Robert L. Wilkie (2018)
See Johnson v. McDonald, 26 Vet.App. 237 (2013).
green
Franklin Gill v. Eric K. Shinseki (2013)
See Johnson v. Shinseki, 26 Vet.App. 237, 239, 248 (2013) (en banc) (holding that "the Court need not address the Board decision with respect to [] matters” that were not argued on appeal, and affirming only the Board’s "decision regarding the matters before the Court”). 2 .
en banc