How cited: National Truck Equipment Ass'n v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration · Go Syfert

National Truck Equipment Ass'n v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2013)

green · 22 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 17 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201420202026
Rule Authority · 6th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Ass’n v. Nat’l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 711 F.3d 662, 667 (6th Cir. 2013) (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A)).
quoting 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A)
Rule Authority · 6th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Ass’n v. NHTSA 711 F.3d 662, 668 (6th Cir.2013).
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Ass’n v. Nat’l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 711 F.3d 662, 675 (6th Cir. 2013) (second alteration in original) (quoting U.S. Telecom Ass’n v. FCC, 359 F.3d 554, 565 (D.C.
second alteration in original
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Page 19 found and the choice made.’” Nat’l Truck Equip. v. Nat’l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 711 F.3d 662, 667 (6th Cir. 2013) (quoting Alliance for Cmty. Media v. F.C.C., 529 F.3d 763, 786 (6th Cir. 2008)).
quoting Alliance for Cmty. Media v. F.C.C., 529 F.3d 763, 786 (6th Cir. 2008)
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 711 F.3d 662, 668 (6th Cir. 2013) (same); Estate of Gerson v. Comm’r., 507 F.3d 435, 438 (6th Cir. 2007) (same); TNS, Inc. v. NLRB, 296 F.3d 384 , 393 (6th Cir. 2002) (same); United States v. Hopper, 941 F.2d 419, 421-22 (6th Cir. 1991) (same).
same
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Ass’n v. Nat’l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 711 F.3d 662, 667 (6th Cir. 2013) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Quote Authority · E.D. Mich. · 2 citations in this opinion
Ass’n v. Nat’l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 711 F.3d 662, 667 (6th Cir. 2013) (“[O]ur role is limited to reviewing the administrative record to determine whether there exists a ‘rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.”) (internal quotation marks omitted).
“[O]ur role is limited to reviewing the administrative record to determine whether there exists a ‘rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.”
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Ass’n v. NHTSA, 711 F.3d 662, 669 (6th Cir. 2013), which applied an “arbitrary and capricious” standard of review to invalidate federal agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act), 29-33 (requiring extensive evidence of “the various considerations” the federal agency “must take into account in making regulatory determinations” and a “comprehensive review of the various factors and tradeoffs”). 7 Id. at 33-34 (noting that “subsequent developments,” including “a mate…
Rule Authority · Tex.
Ass’n v. NHTSA, 711 F.3d 662, 669 (6th Cir. 2013), which applied an “arbitrary and capricious” standard of review to invalidate federal agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act), 29-33 (requiring extensive evidence of “the various considerations” the federal agency “must take into account in making regulatory determinations” and a “comprehensive review of the various factors and tradeoffs”). 7 Id. at 33-34 (noting that “subsequent developments,” including “a mate…
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Ass’n v. NHTSA, 711 F.3d 662, 667 (6th Cir. 2013) (noting, in the context of a challenge to the validity of a federal agency rule, that federal courts will invalidate an agency action if, among other things, the agency has “entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem [or] offered an explanation for its decision that runs counter to the evidence before the agency” (quoting Motor Vehicle Mfrs.
Rule Authority · Tex.
Ass’n v. NHTSA, 711 F.3d 662, 667 (6th Cir. 2013) (noting, in the context of a challenge to the validity of a federal agency rule, that federal courts will invalidate an agency action if, among other things, the agency has “entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem [or] offered an explanation for its decision that runs counter to the evidence before the agency” (quoting Motor Vehicle Mfrs.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Traffic Safety Admin., 711 F.3d 662, 668 (6th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Ass’n v. Nat’l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 711 F.3d 662, 667 (6th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Ass’n v. Nat’l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 711 F.3d 662, 667 (6th Cir. 2013) (quoting Motor Vehicle Mfrs.
quoting Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n of U.S., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983)
Rule Authority · Tax Ct.
Ass’n v. Nat’l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 711 F.3d 662, 668-69 (6th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · W.D. Tenn.
Ass’n v. Nat’l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 711 F.3d 662, 667 (6th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Ass’n v. Nat’l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 711 F.3d 662, 667 (6th Cir.2013).