Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Haliburton Company, et (2013)
red
· 28 citation events
across 6 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Subsequent negative treatment
Vacated by Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. (2014)
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201320192026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Angell v. GEICO Advantage Insurance Company (2021)
The question is not whether plaintiffs and class members will prevail, but rather “whether they will fail or succeed together.” Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., 718 F.3d 423, 431 (5th Cir. 2013) vacated on other grounds, 573 U.S. 258 (2014).
green
Dougherty v. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (2020)
Tenn. July 14, 2017) (“Price impact can be shown either by an increase in price following a fraudulent public statement or a decrease in price following a revelation of the fraud.” (emphasis added) (quoting Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., 718 F.3d 423, 434 (5th Cir. 2013), 1 While Defendants are correct that the R&R did not specifically address the issue of rebuttal, the Magistrate Judge’s comments at the hearing make clear that he understood and considered this…
green
McPeters v. LexisNexis (2014)
In short, “the focus of the 23(b)(3) class certification inquiry — predominance—is not whether the plaintiffs will fail or succeed, but whether they will fail or succeed together.” Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., 718 F.3d 423, 431 (5th Cir. 2013) (citing Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Ret.
citing Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Ret. Plans & Trust Funds, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1184, 1197 , 185 L.Ed.2d 308 (2013)
In its most recent opinion, Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., 718 F.3d 423, 434 (5th Cir.2013), the Fifth Circuit wrote, Although the 10b-5 fraud action does not expressly require proof of price impact as an element of the claim, a plaintiff must nevertheless prevail on this fact in order to establish another element on which the plaintiff does bear the burden of proof: loss causation.
See, e.g., Wal-Mart, supra, — U.S. at —, 131 S.Ct. at 2551 ; Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., 718 F.3d 423, 427-28 , 2013 WL 1809760, *2 (5th Cir. 2013).